SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Ascend Communications (ASND) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: djane who wrote (46373)5/8/1998 8:26:00 PM
From: djane  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 61433
 
Cramer Grapples with the 3Com Confusion [Couple ASND references]
By James J. Cramer
5/8/98 9:11 AM ET

thestreet.com

Damn this 3Com. I don't think I have ever, ever been so soundly whupped by a stock
since Ascend tanked from 75 to 59 last year. Yet, it's not the drop that kills you in this
stock. It's the potential. And that potential is nothing but torture. Because it bleeds you
to death while you wait for it to turn.

Take Thursday's action. A seemingly insignificant "adjustment" for 3Com's quarter, by
Paul Weinstein, the DMG analyst who is closely followed on the stock, an ax if you will,
sent the stock into a volume-choked black hole, down two and change.

Oh, I know Wall Street's euphemisms. An adjustment is like saying someone's "passed
on" instead of saying someone died. A number cut is killer for most tech stocks I follow.

But it shouldn't have been for 3Com. Last week, when I saw the company at the H&Q
technology conference in San Francisco, management presented the exact same case
that Weinstein laid out, warts and all. This time, though, the news was not outlined in the
rosy hue of San Francisco's St. Francis Westin Hotel. It was dumped on us in the stark,
harsh light of the Deutsche Morgan morning call, and it was done by an analyst who
knows his stuff, in a tape that has suddenly gone limp and ragged. No spin; just bad.

I have a small position in 3Com with puts underneath to stop me out if the stock turns
sour. I have more puts than I have stock, a testament to the company's repeatedly
botched attempts to get its U.S. Robotics acquisition right -- and a concession that
3Com's accounting doesn't meet every buyside firm's standard.

As is typical of this stock, though, it broke to a level where my 30 puts don't really
protect me, yet a level I felt compelled to buy. The volume in the stock told me that a
giant shareholder had given up on 3Com, which usually makes me bullish. You need to
lose everybody in a stock like 3Com before it can have a serious advance.

But the subsequent action after the big volume traded made me feel like, in the end, I,
too, have to be shaken out if this stock is ever to have a serious run. The stock couldn't
handle all of the traders and flippers and broke below where it needed to hold if it were
to rally.

To me, 3Com is a pitcher that, if it can get the speed under control, could be a major
leaguer, in the same way that Ascend, when it finally got its business under control,
blossomed into a real hitter.
But yesterday's outing was just one more
two-innings-and-out-high-earned-run-average day.

Why stay tortured? Because 3Com has some businesses with great growth and if it can't
figure them out someone else will. Because 3Com is the classic 3 down, 30 up stock.
Because 3Com used to trade at a much loftier level and I believe it can happen again.
And because I was short 3Com for much of the move down and I believe I can call the
bottom.

Yesterday the bottom was not reached. Probably not today, either. At some point I will
decide if waiting for 3Com is like waiting for Godot. But in the meantime, I'll just keep
the slow water torture going.

Damn that 3Com.



To: djane who wrote (46373)5/8/1998 9:01:00 PM
From: djane  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 61433
 
5/8/98 SmartMoney. Who's on Lucent's Shopping List? [ASND and Nokia most likely]

smartmoney.com

IT IS THE AGE of the mega merger:
Chrysler (C) and
Daimler-Benz
(DAI), Citicorp
(CCI) and
Travelers (TRV),
WorldCom
(WCOM) and
MCI (MCIC),
Lucent
Technologies (LU)
and....

Did you miss
something? No,
because a massive
deal involving the
former telecom
division of AT&T
(T) hasn't
happened, at least
not yet. But on Oct.
1, the two-year
anniversary of its
spinoff from AT&T, Lucent will be officially free to pool
stock when making acquisitions.

That accounting change will give the company tremendous
buying power: Lucent shares have appreciated roughly
315% since the spinoff. At around $73 a share, Lucent's
$95 billion market cap now rivals that of AT&T.
"Post-September, they could do a big one," says
BancAmerica's equipment analyst Paul Johnson, referring to
the merger prospect. "They could do a $10, or $12 or $15
[billion dollar buy] easy, which would be hard to do with
cash."


Under pooling of interest accounting, Lucent will simply be
able to merge its balance sheet with the company it is
acquiring. Now the company must record the buy as a
purchase, as it has done with its many acquisitions so far,
including last week's $1 billion acquisition of networking
equipment firm Yurie Systems. But with pooling of interest,
Lucent will not have to borrow cash for the buy and, more
important, it will not have to write down the goodwill on the
acquisition against its future earnings. The Yurie purchase,
and even last summer's $1.8 billion acquisition of Octel
Communications, are peanuts when you consider that
without fear of having to write off massive goodwill for
expensive tech stocks, Lucent could more easily consider
buying a much larger concern.

Acquisitions aren't the only trick up Lucent's sleeve. On Feb.
18, the company announced the formation of a $100 million
venture capital arm, dubbed Lucent Venture Partners, to be
run by retiring chair Henry Schacht. Its goal is to fill gaps in
Lucent's portfolio in a number of areas, including wireless
networking, semiconductors and software. Lucent is
pursuing the fund entirely as an internal operation, without
outside venture capital involvement.

So who's on Lucent's shopping list? The answer depends on
why you believe the company even needs to buy another
firm. Unlike Ma Bell of old and its ill-fated acquisition of
mainframe computer-maker National Cash Register in 1991,
Lucent has a quest that isn't about just being bigger. This
time around, say Johnson and other analysts, Lucent is
fighting for the very survival of its business. As WorldCom
(WCOM), Qwest Communications (QWST), and the
regional Bells and telecom firms throughout the world
remake their networks to serve the flood of Internet and
corporate data traffic, the phone switches Lucent sells to
these outfits are at risk of becoming obsolete. With packets
of data gaining the upper hand on voice signals, Lucent
ultimately faces competition from Cisco Systems (CSCO)
and other aggressive data networking firms as the line
between the world of telecom equipment and that of Internet
routers disappears.


In that scenario, Lucent's choices are limited but clear: Find
a first-class telecom or networking company that will allow it
to compete against the likes of Cisco. We zeroed in on three
large firms and one smaller one that would make excellent
strategic fits: Ascend Communications (ASND), Nokia
(NOK/A), Bay Networks (BAY) and P-Com (PCMS).


There are, of course, many other possibilities, especially if
Lucent decides its first priority is the international telecom
market, rather than routers and switches or even Internet
telephony. But whatever the nature of Lucent's acquisitions,
most observers seem to agree that the company's path will
bring it more and more into direct competition with Cisco.
The two are edging closer to one another every day, with
both companies this week making major announcements
about upcoming products for high-speed modem technology
known as Digital Subscriber Line (DSL).

Unlike AT&T, Lucent has made vast strides in responding to
changes in the marketplace; however, it is still not as nimble
as its data networking competitors.
But analysts say the
ability to build on its acquisitions through its Bell Labs
division, and the semiconductor resources of its
microelectronics unit, could put the company far ahead of
Cisco when it finally shores up its data networking
background. John Armstrong, principal networking analyst
with market research firm Dataquest, points to Lucent's
expertise in many fundamental parts of networking silicon,
such as sophisticated chips for 10/100 Ethernet networking.
"Lucent, with its tremendous R&D capability, and its
tremendous manufacturing prowess, could do significant
damage to Cisco," says Armstrong.

At the end of the day, Lucent's strongest asset in its battle
against Cisco and the more agile data networkers, could be
its corporate transformation since the spinoff. As of
Wednesday, sources close to the company were talking
about the prospect of a strike in the next couple of weeks by
members of the telecommunication workers union, who are
currently renegotiating the terms of their contracts. Analysts
we spoke with, however, discounted the possibility of a
strike, saying Lucent has put in place bonus, stock option
and profit sharing plans that have galvanized its employees to
focus on benefiting personally from the rapid rollout of new
products.

"Lucent probably best emulates the Silicon Valley business
model, and its stock price is quite rich right now," says one
analyst. "Management is running the company more as an
entrepreneurial shop." It may not be the equal of Cisco in
Internet Protocol gear. But Lucent has already figured out
the Cisco management model, and that could make all the
difference.
NEXT>>

-- By Tiernan Ray

<< DAILY SCREEN ARCHIVE