SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : COMS & the Ghost of USRX w/ other STUFF -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: drmorgan who wrote (15321)5/9/1998
From: David Lawrence  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 22053
 
Opportunity is knocking.....
techstocks.com



To: drmorgan who wrote (15321)5/9/1998 9:39:00 AM
From: Jeff Sheeran  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 22053
 
I have a question on cable modems and dsl. My understanding is that there is already a shortage of bandwidth, if these technologies are rapidly deployed then where will the bandwidth come from? Are these technologies that can use the existing wire or cable and just pass more information? Is my thinkin' screwey on this?

Thanks,
jeff



To: drmorgan who wrote (15321)5/11/1998 4:11:00 PM
From: Moonray  Respond to of 22053
 
AOL Sees Future Connecting Homes to Internet Through TV, Phone

Dulles, Virginia, May 11 (Bloomberg) -- America Online Inc.
has seen the future and it's televisions and telephones --
connecting to the Internet through commonplace technology, rather
than personal computers.

As rivals such as Yahoo! Inc. and Lycos Inc. challenge it on
the Internet, AOL is taking the first steps toward an online TV
service that could put it in almost every U.S. home. Last week,
it announced the acquisition of closely held NetChannel Inc., a
small Internet TV service. AOL is also exploring Web technology
for telephones and handheld computers, said Barry Schuler, head
of interactive services.

The foray into TV and telephones will not be without
problems for the U.S.'s biggest online service, with more than 12
million subscribers. AOL provides access and content, not
equipment, and the new service would need new hardware. Still,
AOL is pushing forward, hoping to leave its competitors behind.

''If you look at the TV, it has 99 percent penetration in
households. That's the number AOL has in mind,'' said Patrick
Keane, an analyst with Jupiter Communications, a New York market
research firm.

Also last week, Spyglass Inc., a Naperville, Illinois-based
company which makes Internet browsers for TVs and telephones,
said it's talking with AOL about creating a product for the
online service.

Web Site Redux

While Dulles, Virginia-based AOL is examining how Internet
use is changing, the company also is refining its existing
service. Among other things, the company is conducting trials of
high-speed Internet access over phone lines in cooperation with
GTE Corp. This summer, it also will reintroduce its Web site,
aol.com, which analysts consider weak when compared with
Yahoo!'s. Schuler declined to specify any changes.

''They can raise revenue and put pressure on competitors
with the Web site,'' said William Blair analyst Abhishek Gami,
who has a ''buy'' recommendation on AOL's stock.

Yahoo!'s Web site ranked first in usage in March among
people accessing the Internet at work, while AOL was rated third,
according to Media Metrix, a service that tracks Internet use.
AOL's site was most popular with home users, with Yahoo! a close
second.

America Online, which has provided online services since
1989, helped popularize the Internet by making it simple and easy-
to-use. That same approach could help AOL make the Internet-on-TV
a mass-market phenomenon, analysts said.

What works for the Internet on the PC may not be suited for
the television or the phone, Schuler said.

Linking TV and the Internet needs to be communal, Schuler
said. An AOL TV service might have a split screen that would let
people watch, say, ''Friends,'' while chatting over the Internet
with other viewers about the show.

Internet TV shopping is another application the company has
high hopes for, he said.

''It's worked well both online and on TV,'' Schuler said.

Risks

Analysts aren't so sure there will be a mass audience for
Internet access through TVs and telephones.

The 25 million households, now online mostly using PCs and
telephone lines, will expand to 57 million by 2002, according to
Jupiter Communications. But only 12 percent of those will go to
the Internet through TV -- that is, through modems provided by
cable TV companies -- Jupiter estimates. There now are only about
200,000 cable-modem subscribers.

Most people ''will still access through dial-up modems,''
said Abhi Chaki, a Jupiter analyst.


There are other problems, and AOL must persuade cable-TV
companies to give it a place on the lineup of channels.

And because AOL doesn't make hardware, it must rely on other
companies to create set-top boxes to hook TVs to AOL.

''The biggest issue is that devices aren't just here yet,''
said William Blair's Gami.

AOL won't say when its Internet TV service might be ready
for prime time. It took the Internet a decade to become a
mainstream medium, and it might take that long for Internet TV,
Schuler said.

''The PC will be No. 1 for the foreseeable future,'' he said.

GROW you AOL, grow! You'll soon be ready for more 3COM equipment.<g>

o~~~ O



To: drmorgan who wrote (15321)5/11/1998 4:38:00 PM
From: Moonray  Respond to of 22053
 
SBC agrees to buy Ameritech for $62 billion
Associated Press - Posted at 10:53 a.m. PDT Monday, May 11, 1998

Fast-growing phone giant SBC Communications Inc. has agreed to purchase
Baby Bell rival Ameritech Corp. for $62 billion in a stock-swap
deal that would be the second-largest merger in corporate history.


The deal, announced today, would create a powerhouse
communications company with operations in nearly every region of the
country, likely to serve as a potent rival to AT&T Corp., and to
WorldCom Inc. after its pending $37 billion takeover of MCI
Communications Corp.

''This is the creation of the first truly global competitor,'' Ameritech
chief executive Richard Notebaert said today. ''We're creating the
best, most competitive global platform our industry has ever seen.''

The combination would be second only to the pending $82 billion
merger of Travelers Group Inc. and Citicorp.

An SBC-Ameritech combination would give the combined company to
be known as SBC 57 million phone lines, or nearly one-third of the
nation's total. By comparison, Bell Atlantic, with operations along the
East Coast, has 41 million phone lines.

Ameritech said it had received assurances no layoffs would occur in its
operating areas, although some cellular operations would have to be
divested to meet federal regulations. The companies expect to save at
least $1 billion with the combination, executives said.

The Federal Communications Commission, which must approve the
deal, had no immediate comment.

But Gene Kimmelman, co-director of Consumer Union's Washington
office, said the group would ask the FCC and the Department of
Justice to block the merger, which he claims will likely lead to higher
local phone rates by reducing competition.

''This merger is extremely dangerous for consumers. It is the inevitable
backslide toward monopoly and results from excessive deregulation and
weak antitrust oversight,'' Kimmelman said.

AT&T also issued a strongly worded statement saying regulators
''shouldn't even think'' about approving the deal until local phone rates
in the two companies' operating areas fall significantly.

If approved by shareholders and regulators, the takeover would leave
just four remaining Bells out of the seven created in the 1984 antitrust
breakup of the original American Telephone & Telegraph Co., which
provided both local and long-distance phone service.

In addition to SBC and Bell Atlantic, the others are U S West near
Denver and BellSouth in Atlanta.

In a series of mergers and acquisitions since deregulation began in
1996, communication companies have been scrambling to outgun the
competition by getting bigger and offering a wider array of services,
including cellular, local and long-distance phone service.

SBC Communications, formerly called Southwestern Bell, has led the
way. It bought San Francisco-based Pacific Telesis Group a year ago
for $16.5 billion and is working to complete its $5 billion acquisition of
Southern New England Telecommunications Corp. of Connecticut.

''Merger mania might not be what the Telecom Act had in mind, but
this is the path many local and long distance companies are taking,'' said
Atlanta-based telecommunications analyst Jeffrey Kagan. ''And if
Telecom is shaping up to be a battle of titans, then Ameritech and SBC
aren't going to be wallflowers.''

SBC would be paying a premium over Ameritech's market value of
$48.3 billion, based on Friday's closing stock price of $43.875 a share.

Ameritech's stock jumped $2.43 3/4, or 5.6 percent, to $46.313 a share
in early trading on the New York Stock Exchange. SBC's stock fell
$1.18 3/4, or 2.8 percent, to $41.18 3/4 a share.

''Given the size and significance of the transaction we expect close
scrutiny but ultimate approval from regulatory authorities,'' said Edward
E. Whitacre Jr., chairman and chief executive officer of SBC.

Whitacre stressed the combination would not be restoring the old Bell
nationwide system that was broken up 14 years ago.

''This is no monopoly,'' he said. ''Both our companies and the combined
companies will have competition.''

The companies said Whitacre would remain as chairman and chief
executive of SBC. Notebaert will remain as chairman and chief
executive officer of Ameritech.

Until now, Notebaert has appeared determined to remain independent,
avoiding the combination frenzy of other Bells while aggressively
purchasing large stakes in European phone companies.

But analysts have noted that Ameritech, based in Chicago, appeared a
ripe takeover target because of its solid Midwestern business and what
some called its failure to move aggressively to compete under the new
era of deregulation.

The parent of phone companies in Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Ohio and
Wisconsin, Ameritech has other non-core businesses such as cable
television and its home-security business.

Both Ameritech and SBC, like all Baby Bells, have sought to get into
the $90 billion long-distance business. Ameritech has been working with
state and federal regulators to break into the Michigan long-distance
market.

SBC has taken another route, turning to the courts in many cases, to
force regulators to move more quickly to allow it to move into
Oklahoma and other states.

o~~~ O