SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Apple Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mark Palmberg who wrote (13251)5/9/1998 4:22:00 PM
From: Zen Dollar Round  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 213177
 
Why don't consumers insist that software producers release their products on the
more reliable, higher-capacity, more durable CD's anyway? The investment in a CD
burner would easily be recouped by not having to replace failed or lost diskettes?


I tend to agree, except that it's a bit of a waste to put a 500k program on a CD-ROM or even a 5MB one on several floppies, given that a CD-ROM can hold 650MB of data. That, and I imagine that floppies are still easier and cheaper to produce. I'm not sure at what point a CD-ROM becomes more cost effective.

CD-ROMs aren't recycleable either as far as I know, although that's of little concern to most companies. I've always thought it was cool that you could send off all the old program disks you have to a recycling company, like Green Disk, or reuse them for your own purposes.



To: Mark Palmberg who wrote (13251)5/10/1998 11:02:00 PM
From: Linda Kaplan  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 213177
 
There are problems with bad CD-ROM discs, jsut as they are with bad floppy disks. Furthermore, I got a CD-ROM disc with my latest modem and that CD-ROM wouldn't read. Now it's cracked. Phooie.

It's only cost efficient for a company to release on CD-ROM if they have huge sales. If they have modest sales and modestly sized software, it's not efficient to release on CD.

Linda