Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : SOUTHERNERA (t.SUF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GULL who wrote (1081)	5/9/1998 4:58:00 PM
From: INFOMAN	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7235

You have a point. They do seem to attack you on a personal basis, regardless of what input you share with the other participants on this thread. I believe your contribution has been valuable and don't quite understand why their response is so indignant, considering what they have said to you. I do recall your first postings on this thread, especially those which referred to Randgold. Your observations were correct. Hopefully, they will now stick to the business at hand, which concerns the operational and managerial acumen of the executives who act for SUF, and who should be accountable to their shareholders.

To: GULL who wrote (1081)	5/10/1998 3:06:00 AM
From: INFOMAN	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 7235

The hysterical, repetitive, regurgitating chatter of this child ' GOALIE' was amusing but he has now become a bore. In actual fact he is SUF's worst enemy. He could not have assisted in damaging SUF's credibility more, even if he was paid by the very heirs themselves. Ignore him. Randgold, SUF's partner in the Klipspringer project is heavily in the red. Their own annual financial statement shows that they are in trouble, serious negative cash flows, not meeting production target costs etc. SUF, if they can, should try and get out of that deal with Randgold, especially if they have not contributed anything in so far as cash is concerned. Could this be the reason why SUF are negotiating with De Beers? By the way, do you know if SUF conducted any environmental impact studies while they were prospecting arround the M1 site? I would hope that they had at least left the area in a reasonable state after they had completed their prospecting. I will be shortly investigating this matter further. Plus others. I will keep you posted.