SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Knighty Tin who wrote (28068)5/10/1998 12:29:00 AM
From: geewiz  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 132070
 
Mike,

Thanks, that's more than I hoped for. I like companies that have fallen badly, and it usually happens when the analysts are dumping on them.

Avoid boutiques and pay attention to the facts. Surprising how many times I've taken cited facts for granted.

But you are telling me that the numbers are skewed? From such reputable sources? I am shocked! (vbg)

thanks, art



To: Knighty Tin who wrote (28068)5/10/1998 2:05:00 PM
From: John Tais  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 132070
 
Mike, how do you keep up with what the various analysts are saying?
Do you rely on the news wires, do you get it from friends, or is there
a good service that summarizes all these guys? I assume you are not
a paying customer of most of these firms! What do you think is a good
source of biotech info? Do you get Jim McCamant's newsletter or what?
Thanks a bunch.



To: Knighty Tin who wrote (28068)5/11/1998 10:23:00 PM
From: Kerry Phineas  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 132070
 
MB, I'd use Value Line before a Wall Street analyst anyday. They suck, but at least they're attempting to be honest with their picks. I wouldn't use their number one picks, but I would go through their fours and fives to look for a stock. How does Value Line cook the books?