SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : AMD:News, Press Releases and Information Only! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Maxwell who wrote (6086)5/12/1998 12:16:00 AM
From: Elmer  Respond to of 6843
 
<We told you so Elmer.>

I never disagreed with that point. Just questioned your claim that it was slower than a Pentium 200, but let's not bring that up again (blush).

EP



To: Maxwell who wrote (6086)5/12/1998 12:41:00 AM
From: Time Traveler  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 6843
 
Celeron is created to satisfy the crowd that THINK (or not knowing any better) CPU power has reached a plateau. They thus can purchase Celeron system, which is Slot-I and capable of being upgraded to a more advanced processor later on. On the other hand, people like Time Traveler and most corporate do insist on highest performance computers with the mundane architecture (Windows platform). They then can purchase full Deschutte system, which is again very Slot-I. That leaves out people in between, at least only a very small handful.

I am afraid Time Traveler is not convinced that Intel has made a BOO BOO.

Time Traveler



To: Maxwell who wrote (6086)5/12/1998 9:14:00 PM
From: Francis Chow  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 6843
 
<Intel once again made a BOO BOO.>

Right. In fact, I think they now realize it. Even if
they release a good Celeron in Q4, I think they've damaged
the brand name, and they've damaged the Intel Inside
moniker too. They were extremely arrogant to think they
could get away with a cra* like the Celeron. Of course,
Intel recovered from the Pentium bug fiasco (another
example of arrogance). I wonder if they will be as lucky
this time . . . a friend of mine says you can only fool
the American people once - a scandal smear destroyed Gary
Hart, but the same trick doesn't work the second time on
Clinton (my friend's example, not mine).