SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Hal Rubel who wrote (6989)5/13/1998 12:28:00 AM
From: LR  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74651
 
The rant begins:

I am doubtful that the DOJ wants a deal. At least not before they've had their press. Since they don't want to go after FOB(Filegaters and Obstructors of Justice) Bubba they have to justify their liawyer(that's how you spell it) existence.

MSFT treats their average public customer badly[proof: try calling their tech. support line(what a joke, recordings and infinite holds or big charges)]. Or better yet, go to their website and get the "COOKIE REQURED" message and be switched to the condescending
"DO YOU KNOW WHAT A COOKIE IS?" message. Yes I do jack ass, and I don't want you to have it on my machine.

I'm in and out of MSFT stock so this court action can be played either way, but it's the principle of Big Brother government that irks me. I don't mind the DOJ but the states AGs need to be shunted.

After slithering under rocks for so long, their eyes aren't used to the light and they don't understand(or don't care) about potential consequences.
Example: Tobacco cases. Now Guatemala
is suing the tobacco companies.

Wait until other countries start suing our "bad" companies and start putting Americans out of work, people unlike
AG David "Oops, unemployed boxmakers vote too" Morales or
Judge Thomas "Wannabee" Jackson.

End rant.



To: Hal Rubel who wrote (6989)5/13/1998 1:13:00 AM
From: Dwight E. Karlsen  Respond to of 74651
 
Why innovate when marketing is good enough.

Hal, those hordes of MSFT programmers don't just stop working because of some court ruling. MSFT is a very competitive company, and they strive to improve their products because they have high-quality employees who enjoy their jobs.

Actually one of the biggest complaints about MSFT is that they go on to the next great upgrade before the previous one even has all the bugs worked out. John Dvorak's [PC Magazine] most recent column is about this very thing. John D. wishes that MSFT would have spent more time ironing out the quirks of Win95, and he laments the fact that Win98 is already on the brink of shipping.

I somewhat agree with this philosophy, and I hope that MSFT does spend the next 12 months ironing out the quirks of Win98 and the built -in IE 4.0 that comes with it. I've already heard several horror stories about IE 4.0 and Win98 beta rendering people's systems unusable, and these aren't newbie people.



To: Hal Rubel who wrote (6989)5/13/1998 10:09:00 PM
From: Maverick  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74651
 
Late yesterday, MICROSOFT CORP said the company sees "no merit"
to a SUN MICROSYSTEMS INC effort to get a preliminary injunction
against the company's Windows 98 operating system. Tom Burt,
Microsoft's associate general counsel, said the software giant has
not yet been served with motions filed under seal by Sun in U.S.
District Court in San Jose. "Based on what Sun has said publicly
about the papers... there is no merit at all to Sun's preliminary
injunction motions," Burt said. Burt and other Microsoft
executives on the call said they did not expect Sun to be
successful in its request for a preliminary injunction, and they
declined to say what the impact of such a measure might be.
(Reuters 05:04 PM ET 05/12/98) For the full text story, see
infobeat.com

* Late yesterday, a U.S. Court of Appeals sided with MICROSOFT
CORP by stopping a 1997 lower court decision from interfering with
the release of Windows 98. The appellate court order -- which will
have no effect on any new antitrust case that states or the
Justice Department may file -- said the government had a "very
weak" chance of winning a permanent injunction against Windows 98
under the old U.S. District Court case from last year. (Reuters
06:09 PM ET 05/12/98) For the full text story, see
infobeat.com