Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Corporate Vision (CVIA) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: campe who wrote (4896)	5/13/1998 1:34:00 PM
From: Novice Bob	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 6654

Dear Lurker: I feel this deal is a mistake, Jack may have made a mistake by letting it go this far. We have no evidence that Mr. Charles has any experience in the oil and tire business. We have evidence of fruits of his past efforts. Another company he is a Director on (ETC)has a very impressive record of private placements, worthless warrants, and declining stock price. This may explain why WOTD is keeping a low profile. I am sure Mr. Arnold is a very fine person with very good intentions, however I am not so sure of WOTD's good intentions. Why don't you Email me with your thoughts and facts as to why you believe we should allow this merger to take place. If we are investigating the wrong Mr. Charles, or if WOTD can come forward with a viable plan to be implemented by experienced people and said plan will not take our investment away from us, I am open to review it. To date, only talk, Reg. S's and reverse spilt, and no communications from our CEO, except a deal is close to happening (but no details until it is a done deal).... Really!!! I own a piece of this company and I will not blindly hand over my piece or have it taken away from me with out a fight. What ever it takes, more SEC letters, proxy vote, etc... I will be asking questions to the ETC thread tonight via PMs as to how they feel about Mr. Charles as one of their directors. I want to find out everything about this Mr. Charles, up to and including his driving record! Robert bobhil@ameritech.net

To: campe who wrote (4896)	5/13/1998 2:53:00 PM
From: TraderGreg	Respond to of 6654

My heart really bleeds for poor old Jack. First, he finesses a slick deal to shove a 1 for 300 reverse down the shareholders throats, then backs off and then plans another REG S with the same reverse to look forward to. Let Artie Levitt and his crew earn our tax dollars. TG

To: campe who wrote (4896)	5/13/1998 2:58:00 PM
From: D LEE	Respond to of 6654

Dear Lurker: Yours is Good food for thought in my book. I am being distracted now, but will respond favorably to your comments when I am free. Here is my e-mail as well. Perhaps you may desire to send an extra letter as you send to Novice Bob. Your thoughts deserve mention on the CVIA Thread. Dave badlee@flash.net

To: campe who wrote (4896)	5/13/1998 3:35:00 PM
From: K A Anderson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6654

To the Lurker Lets Review. A fully compliant SEC trading shell (equal to CVIA has a book value of apx $1,000,000) At one point in time CVIA had 1. 50,000,000 shares out standing or .05 a share in value 2. 150,000,000 shares outstanding or .015 a share value when fully diluted 3. Why do you think it has been so easy to raise $1,500,000 in Reg S capitol the pro's know this also. Now that is why Jack didnt let CVIA die ! CVIA wouldnt have died, if nothing else a company or investors would have bought the shell. From the investors. Now Jack takes over (Jack is at best minority owner) and since he has been there my calculator wont even give me a book value of all this dilution. If they wanted to salvage CVIA they should have assigned a SECURITIES ATTORNEY to manage it as A TRUSTEE, until a favorable merger was found. But No one was around to make this decision so Jack stepped in. WOTD probably targeted Jack because of his good nature, his desire to do well, willingness to co-operate and lack of experience in these matters. I like Jack, think he is a good man, and the worst part about this whole deal is being placed on the other side of the issue from him on many of these matters. KAA

To: campe who wrote (4896)	5/13/1998 6:11:00 PM
From: Bill Monahan	Respond to of 6654

>>>> REALITY CHECK CVIA is a shell with $500,000 in the bank.<<<< Maybe Jack bank account, but not CVIA's I'd love to see the proof that that money is in the bank! You are kidding yourself.

To: campe who wrote (4896)	5/13/1998 6:35:00 PM
From: FloridaGatorMike	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6654

response to lurker.... you make it sound as if we were all holding this worthless stock, then Jack came into the picture to save us all...... but most of us bought into CVIA after Jack and WOTD started negotiating.. we knew the incredible potential of this merger and had confidence in Jack to look out for our best interests... if this merger had been negotiated using just a little common sense and intelligence, we'd be singing his praises right now.. just by letting the merger happen before a reverse split is even mentioned would have helped plenty!! why not let CVIA/WOTD build up some steam before a heavy blow like that???????? It's just plain STUPIDITY... now they're ready to hit us again!!!! I'm sorry, but I don't see how ANYONE could be defending this crook?!?!? Just my humble opinion!..... p.s.... Does anyone know if CVIA has acknowledged the proxy vote count?? or are they ignoring it?? I would expect the later....