SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : TAVA Technologies (TAVA-NASDAQ) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bonzo who wrote (16816)5/13/1998 1:44:00 PM
From: Craig Rogers  Respond to of 31646
 
Joe: I appreciate your informed post. I wish I had the stock savy that you and most on this board have, but I don't.

I just have a enough sense to know that Tava is the only game in town and it's a Big game and that they will come through.

Craig



To: Bonzo who wrote (16816)5/13/1998 2:42:00 PM
From: JDN  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 31646
 
Dear Joe: An excellent rebuttal. I am impressed!! JDN



To: Bonzo who wrote (16816)5/13/1998 5:29:00 PM
From: M. Frank Greiffenstein  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 31646
 
Trailing revenues compared to expectations, a solid investment principle...

Joe writes:

<<Trailing revenues? Now that you sell we are going to finally focus on trailing revenues?
Since when did anyone buy this stock based on trailing revenues? Its future earnings
potential that I continue to maintain my position and add to it going forward.>>

That's a distortion of my point Joe. I am comparing the most recent trailing revenues to **our expectations of what trailing revenues would be** when we first started prognisticating. What is wrong with that? For example, Red Chip (which you, I and others touted as proof, don't deny it) projected 18 million in revenue for Q3, consistent with the company's beliefs. TAVA fell **7 million short** of that. You think enough of Red Chip to go to their conference. Why do you suddenly deny the improtance of Red Chip projections?

Joe, it is a common vanity of people to believe that because they met a CEO face to face that somehow they understand him and have some advantage that other investors don't have. Sorry, but a pleasant lunch with a CEO means nothing to me. CEOs are supposed to be positive and upbeat. Jenkins was positive and upbeat about Q3/98 during the CC last October, and all his optimism didn't get TAVA even close to projecitons. I am sure he is a fine CEO and honorable man. But the issue is real world execution vs. expectations.

DocStone