Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : PLFM - Undervalued with great potential -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rangel Melendez who wrote (2487)	5/13/1998 5:35:00 PM
From: cliff emohs	Read Replies (5) \| Respond to of 9096

Well Mr Melendez, I too have read every long, short, boring, mean, stupid, post on this thread. Been in since Oct.97, and I just want to say, that was the best dang post I have read. It had meat, guts, understanding, hope, and down right cool. This is only the third time I have written on this thread. A lot of wasted time already, but heck you have to jump in once in awhile. I have one general question, you might be able to answer with your background. Would the general population trust having unmaned planes flying 60,000 feet above them? Wouldn't it be a little unsettling, if they knew? The planes would be coming and going all the time if they were to cover a large land area. One of them is bound to fail or at worst crash. What would happen? Thanks again for post.

To: Rangel Melendez who wrote (2487)	5/13/1998 5:51:00 PM
From: Netnut7	Respond to of 9096

I read from a post way back that PLFM had had a big contract pending but leaked info to investors. The other company found out about the leak and pulled away from the contracts. This is a mistake they are not going to make with this one. I believe they are acting very professionally.

To: Rangel Melendez who wrote (2487)	5/13/1998 9:36:00 PM
From: BIG EYE	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 9096

Dear CWO Melendez, Thank you for your inspirational post. You should have been in a PR officer in an indoc/inspirational unit. I was an enlisted man in an Airborne unit when I first joined the Army. I know you well. You are a part of me. When you said, "...and this one has a good chance if management wakes up.", I knew you were truly committed. But you come to the table with a military mentality. So, you are missing the point. In a commercial endeavour, the clients will NOT tolerate interruptions of service. It can cost business a fortune to be out of touch. For years, the most reliable way to make a call between Rio and Sao Paulo was to go THROUGH MIAMI or NEW YORK. Yes, sounds crazy. Check it out. It is also obvious, that many on the thread don't realize that the Rio - Sao Paulo area is ON THE COASTLINE!!! They also do NOT realize that the area is situtate on an EAST/WEST axis. That means that the "airborne relay vehicle" could be flown OFFSHORE! No worries about crashes into the large urban area --- that is, IF THE WEATHER PERMITS. That is why I am interested in the ALTITUDE capability of the vehicles. You also logically indicate that the PLFM technology could find military applications. I need not remind you of the constraints imposed by our government regarding technology that has military applications. Enough said. But really, the only seriously HOSTILE area's in S.A. are drug related. Most other military activity is related to smuggling and politics. Like Nam, not something easily solved with/by high-tech applications, like PLFM. Please keep thinking and asking questions.