Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : MIRANDOR-MIQ ON MONTREAL -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sailfish who wrote (1901)	5/14/1998 4:06:00 PM
From: Sawdusty	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2635

Ahh Raymond, a practical man, one with vision. A most believable scenario, one that has crossed my own mind. Perhaps you should be the one getting paid? :-)) "For the above reason, I don't buy that "fund" explanation...It's as weak an argument that can be made and should have been backed up with some rationale or else not even brought up..." My sentiments exactly. Regards, Dan

To: Sailfish who wrote (1901)	5/14/1998 10:50:00 PM
From: tiloup	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2635

Hello Ray, Nice to hear from you again. Your idea of someone keeping a lid on miq's price by dumping their shares cheap is certainly as good as any scenario I can come up with. This said, I do not understand the rationale for selling cheap if they intend on buying them back in the near future. If Miq pops they lose on every share they sell and buy back. BTW I agree with Brandon that people want to be where everyone else is and right now its not gold. The grass is greener in techs, yesterday an internet company increased 214%. If gold rises the herd will be roaring back in our quiet pasture. I intend on making them pay quite a few multiples of current price for my lot. All I am interested in right now is fundamentals as long as they are sound I will be long. Norm