Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Bob Brinker: Market Savant & Radio Host -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: sea_biscuit who wrote (4982)	5/14/1998 5:38:00 PM
From: Justa Werkenstiff	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42834

Dipy: Speaking for myself, nope. Let's roll back the tape further. My original posting to you was concerning your concerns about this thread's objectivity Message 4371929 Message 4372203 which turned out to be, at least in part, to be concerns you had about Truman: Message 4379911 Message 4388454 Now here is the post 4873 you mentioned along with your response to it and your query to me: Message 4374645 Message 4382871 Message 4388454 As a result of all this, this subsequently turned into a discussion about Truman which is where we are now <g>: Message 4391113 Message 4458380 So, as far as I see it, this whole discussion we have had so far originated from your concerns about Truman. You said the following in your last post: "My reference to Truman in my posting was because of your reference to Truman in your posting. And my posting was in reply to your posting! Are we missing something here?" The only thing you might be missing is that this discussion resulted originally from your disagreement with Truman (his "objectivity") and not from any post I may have made about Truman. I do see this in your post about Truman: "He probably thinks that he owns this thread, just because he originated it!" That is a clear dig to me. Perhaps we just have different perspectives on what is going on here unless you are going to tell me that you are being "objective" one and I am not <g>. What do you think of this idea? Maybe we should change the topic from Truman to something else now or have you and I "truly" made this the "Truman Discussion Thread <g>?" I am ready to move on, how about you?