Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : FAMH - FIRAMADA Staffing Services -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Little Engine who wrote (17775)	5/16/1998 11:53:00 AM
From: Don Pueblo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27968

Most of the people here don't appreciate Little's insight, but I like him. Let's move on to another big fave: Message 4483433

To: Little Engine who wrote (17775)	5/16/1998 12:09:00 PM
From: Jamessmith	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 27968

MMs can short OTC BB, though investors are not allowed. They hire many little chicken spreading baseless rumors, twisting facts and confusing investors. Yes, MMs know FAMH will go up, this is the reason they are shorting and dumping FAMH, and they will pump FAMH. Thus they can double their profits. Some bashers lack basic knowledge in stock investment, but talk like a pro or an investor> You are not a shareholder of FAMH, why do you have to waste time here? Don't be native somebody who does own FAMH will spend many hours a day watching for your investment!!! Just be careful out there, there are so many thugs with their suckers running on the streets of NYC. James

To: Little Engine who wrote (17775)	5/16/1998 1:05:00 PM
From: Pugs	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 27968

>>>>> As I have asked before, and never gotten an answer: if the MM's are indeed shorting (and I believe FAMH has 12 MM's... what a conspiracy that they should all try to short at once... and the SEC never catches on?) then at what level do they plan to cover?<<<<<< MM's 'always' short together, it's called 'churning', it gives the 'illusion' of volume and selling and is used by MM's to create panic selling on behalf of those short and naked. Look for buying on the bid, when you see buys on the bid you see MM's selling to eachother. The SEC acknowledges there are abuses by give MM's some room to create 'liquidity' in the market, unfortunately for investors, this freedom has been abused and is now even more harmful as the internet has been intergrated into the MM's arsenal. MM's hope to never cover, and hopefully terminally short a stock to zero. In fact, a legitimate 'scam' is a shortsellers wet dream, they can illegally short a stock, never have to cover and be applauded as 'consumer advocates', this is why they are so quick to compare a company to GIFS, SEXI or BRE-X. Asking why a MM would short a penny stock is answered by why you would invest in one. If a stock is $.02/share and goes to $.04 you make 100% profit. On the other hand, short a BB stock from $.02 to $.01 , and you create the volume on top of it, you bet you'd hire guys to slam these stocks all day. Pugs

To: Little Engine who wrote (17775)	5/16/1998 4:49:00 PM
From: Turboe	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27968

I agree with you LE-- I would never short a .30 stock-- or even a stock under 2... Bet you do not check under your bed for monsters..

To: Little Engine who wrote (17775)	5/17/1998 2:43:00 AM
From: JIN CHUN	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 27968

LE, no offense, but I think that anyone who has been on the thread since last January knows what's going on. First, you have brought up interesting points, and questions which have needed answers. On the other hand, you have also spent way too much time on this thread for someone that doesn't have a position, and you have indeed posted many comments that were either without fact or a distortion of the fact. Does anyone remember post # 1453? with Cheryl's trading log, or #1546 where you incorrectly gave the industry average for employee leasing, etc, etc... or the times where you left out information from the 4300 series rules, or the times where you told me over and over and over again that Atrix had forced FAMH's hand by the timing of the releases?(moot point). Come LE, a loss of less than $100 has you this hellbent? Jin.

To: Little Engine who wrote (17775)	5/17/1998 7:05:00 PM
From: John Fairbanks	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27968

This company doesn't need bashers to make it look bad -- the company officers are doing an excellent job of that all by themselves. In fact, if all these paranoid evil MM fantasies were true, they sure wouldn't need to hire anyone to bash the stock... just let Ira and Arif put out more press releases announcing events and dates they won't follow through on... This company is absolutely it's own worst enemy. When the Undervalued Dog mentioned a bunch of paid shills all it made me wonder is how many shares they have. Looks like they are trying to manipulate the price upward so they can get out unscathed.