SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Elmer who wrote (32718)5/16/1998 5:40:00 PM
From: Kevin K. Spurway  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1571682
 
Elmer,

K6-3D 300/100 Winstone 98 (more to PII's advantage than Winstone 97) = 21.8

Pentium II 300/100 Winstone 98 = 22.7.

sysdoc.pair.com

The difference is negligible. Plus, the K6 chip with 3D drivers lets you blast space mutants faster.

Not to mention the K6 is MUCH cheaper.

So to say, "the PII easily out performs the K6-x clock for clock" is just plain inaccurate.

What is accurate is that the K6 EASILY outperforms the PII dollar for dollar.

Kevin



To: Elmer who wrote (32718)5/16/1998 11:42:00 PM
From: Kenith Lee  Respond to of 1571682
 
Elmer,

Both Celeron and PII came off the same wafer. Celeron is PII except that Intel put in a less functional chipset, remove the cache, and w/o the brick cover. It is like a carmel coated candy apple and a chocolate coated one.