To: Terry T. who wrote (7124 ) 5/18/1998 4:04:00 PM From: I Am John Galt Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 18444
Burns bridges for future investor communications? What, are you kidding me? Terry, honestly, I'm not bashing what you're saying, but are you telling me that the stuff they've been telling us holds any water anyways? Fine, I'm all for not yelling at her, but call her up, and ask her who gave her that deadline. If it's Hayton, people should start paying hommage to the nays.Here, there are (i) dramatic changes which bode well I don't believe them. It's that simple. They have continuously lied. Let me put it this way. We know the history of this company in terms of press releases and what not. If the IR firm is being lied to by the upper echelon, how is that any different?and (ii) at the same time could (I am not saying they do) justify delays, accounting interpretation issues, possible SEC review issues. For six months? What time frame do you suggest that the justification for delays ends? You are losing money right before your eyes, and you know why your investment continues to lose money. Why don't you go after these guys?If all we had were hollow promises of becoming a reporting company, we would have every right to complain I fear that Hayton will let this company go bankrupt before it gets to that point. Trust me, I learned a great deal about business in the past couple months, and this is my largest fear.Until we know for a fact we are being strung out, venting our spleen at the wrong person or for the wrong reason makes us look ridiculous, and burns bridges for future investor communications Any more ridiculous than they're making us look now? Questions to ponder: 1)Who is the majority shareholder? 2)How many shares does the BOD obtain from the proposed acquisition? 3)Will these financials be out before the end of the month? Matty Gregg