Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: J. M. Burr who wrote (2878)	5/18/1998 6:22:00 PM
From: John Curtis	Respond to of 27311

I'm off-site and relatively unavailable, but it looks like VLNC's beginning to move in the right direction. Good luck to all of us! Regards! John~

To: J. M. Burr who wrote (2878)	5/18/1998 7:45:00 PM
From: Jay Lowe	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 27311

>> could find no room for pessimism ... Now don't take this wrong; I'm a pessaholic. One could also read the PR to say "Delphi has decided to pull out of the collaboration. They're yanking their engineers out of Henderson and won't help pay the bills on the facility any more. Maybe they'll work on auto batteries, but not with VLNC's help. Besides, they've figured out that LI-poly is overkill for the auto market anyway as there are cheaper technologies available when mass and shape are not crucial. VLNC weakly responds by reiterating the old company line yet again, having been thrown for a loss by Delphi's pull-out. Lev, not having any real news, attempts damage control by repeating their intent to make batteries someday." Who knows? Certainly not me. I'm holding. My response to the "news" was to call their IR (FRB) and ask for details on the CC. Again ... this was an intentionally pessimistic interpretation, for which I have no facts. So why do I bother? I want real news.