Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: gnuman who wrote (55849)	5/20/1998 5:42:00 PM
From: Francis Chow	Respond to of 186894

If it's as low as 0.70, then it is considerably below the Q1 number of 0.84.

To: gnuman who wrote (55849)	5/20/1998 5:56:00 PM
From: SEMIHH	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 186894

We all know how wrong analysts can be, Gene. Lately, there's been nothing but downside surprises, and yet, our analyst friends keep raising numbers for later this year and 1999. Nope, I think the analysts are just as hard-headed as most of the INTC bulls on this board...it's doubtful they make .70 at this point...my guess is more like .40, if they are lucky....and what would happen if (Gasp!) INTC actually lost money for the quarter??? Don't forget the lessons of the past, INTC was right there for the oversupply and price erosion in watch chips (remember Microma? probably, you don't). The semiconductor chip suppliers have done this time and time again to themselves, fortunately, I have a very, very long memory, and I don't believe that just because there are a bunch of PhDs running the company, that they will not repeat their same mistakes...