Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : A.I.M Users Group Bulletin Board -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bruce A. Bowman who wrote (4738)	5/21/1998 8:27:00 AM
From: greg welch	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 18928

Hi Bruce, I also have no "under-valued" stocks. One (DELL) they said was 138% "over-valued". Do you think the 100% increase in price since 01/01/98 for DELL could have anything to do with this "over-valued" rating? AIM seems to "feel" just fine taking care of DELL... Greg P.S. I'm not sure, but I can't figure out if their worksheet takes into account the many 2:1 splits DELL has had...

To: Bruce A. Bowman who wrote (4738)	5/21/1998 9:13:00 AM
From: Steve Nelson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 18928

I found one. My SUPX is supposedly undervalued by 36%. My other holdings are overvalued or do not compute. One, CDG, is an oil exploration stock and supposedly does not compute because of some accounting rule. For the same reason, the calculator can not value cable companies. Thanks Bruce, that was fun. SteveN