SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Pharmos(PARS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: yosi s who wrote (849)5/23/1998 9:20:00 PM
From: LemonHead  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1491
 
I did not know that they had invested $72 million as of 12/97?

PHARMOS CORP
Filed on May 14 1998

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The Company has generated limited revenues from product sales and has been dependent upon external financing, interest income, and research and development contracts to pursue its intended business activities. The Company has not been profitable since inception and has incurred a cumulative net loss of $72,069,727 through December 31, 1997. Losses have resulted principally from costs incurred in research activities aimed at identifying and developing the Company's product candidates, clinical research studies, merger and acquisition costs, the write-off of purchased research and development, and general and administrative expenses. The Company expects to incur additional operating expenses over the next several years as the Company's research and development and clinical trials programs continue. The Company's ability to achieve profitability is dependent on the level of revenues from the sale of drug substance to support Lotemax and Alrex coupled with its ability to develop and obtain regulatory approvals for its product candidates, to enter into agreements for product development and commercialization with strategic corporate partners and to develop the capacity to manufacture and sell its products, and to secure additional financing. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Liquidity and Capital Resources."

Results of Operations

Years Ended December 31, 1997 and 1996

Total operating expenses increased by $208,028, or 2.5 %, from $8,354,991 in 1996 to $8,563,019 in 1997. Marketing expenses totaling $598,385 which is comprised of bulk material purchases of loteprednol etabonate ("LE"), the active drug-stubstance of Lotemax and Alrex, were principally offset by reductions in research and development, net, patents, general and administrative and depreciation and amortization expenses.

Net research and development expenses decreased by $141,084, or 2.5%, from $5,604,592 in 1996 to $5,463,508 in 1997. The completion of the clinical trials associated with the Company's NDA submissions for LE resulted in a decrease in R&D expense. The company increased participation in approved R&D reimbursement programs which contributed to a reduction in R&D expense. Increased costs for toxicology studies for the LE-T program (a combination of LE and Tobramycin) and Dexanabinol, as well as activities to advance the manufacturing of LE, partially offset the decrease in R&D expense.

In accordance with its obligations under the Marketing Agreements to supply Bausch & Lomb with specified quantities of LE (the active drug-substance), the Company purchased quantities of LE and smaller quantities of a key reagent required for the manufacture of LE, in the amount of $2,403,012. Certain quantities of LE, totaling $598,385, that were purchased during 1997, for use in testing, and marketing activities (principally producing free samples of the product) were charged to results of operations in 1997. Purchases of LE that totaled $1,804,627 and were made subsequent to the Company being advised by the FDA that LE was an approvable drug have been recorded as inventory at December 31, 1997.

On September 8, 1997, the Company signed an agreement terminating the 1992 licensing agreement with the University of Florida, and returned the rights to technologies that the Company had previously ceased developing. The termination agreement included a waiver of $416,249 in accounts payable due the

University.

Patent expenses decreased by $70,096, or 25%, from $281,412 in 1996 to $211,316 in 1997. This decrease is due to the timing of completion of certain patent applications.

General and administrative expense decreased by $89,300, or 4%, from $2,123,392 in 1996 to $2,034,092 in 1997. Lower expenses associated with the completion of the Company's NDAs for Lotemax and Alrex as well as the closure of its Florida facility were primarily responsible for the decreased general and administrative costs.

Depreciation and amortization expenses decreased by $89,877, or 26%, from $345,595 in 1996 to $255,718 in 1997, reflecting reduced depreciation expense relating to the Alachua, Florida operation.

Interest and other income, net of interest and other expenses, increased by $51,692, or 19%, from $277,782 in 1996 to $329,472 in 1997. Interest and other income, net, increased as a result of higher average cash balances, and net foreign exchange gains.

Years Ended December 31, 1996 and 1995

Total revenues decreased by $75,000 from 1995. Revenues in 1995 related to fees the Company received as a result of sublicensing certain technologies which were not being actively developed by the Company.

Total operating expenses increased by $101,325, or 1%, from $8,253,666 in 1995 to $8,354,991 in 1996 due to increased research and development spending partially offset by lower general, administrative and other expenses.

Research and development expenses increased by $925,513, or 20%, primarily due to significant spending on clinical trails in 1996. During the past year, the company initiated and completed Phase III clinical trials of Lotemax for the treatment of uveitis and post cataract surgery as well as Phase III clinical trials of Alrex for the treatment of seasonal ocular allergies. In October of 1996, the Company commenced a Phase II study of HU-211 for severe head injury. In February 1997, the Company submitted an NDA for Alrex and in March 1997, the Company amended and supplemented the previously filed NDA for Lotemax with the results of the 1996 clinical trials. The increased clinical trial expenses were partially offset by cost saving measures taken by the Company in early 1995 that focused research and development activities on products which were closest to commercialization. Bausch & Lomb net reimbursements for clinical trials totaled $1.2 million during 1996, thereby reducing research and development expenses by this amount.

Patent expense decreased by $199,447, or 41%, in 1996. The company was able to reduce patent maintenance costs by returning to an original patent holder several patents covering technologies which are no longer being pursued. Further, the Company's in-house patent counsel now executes work previously undertaken by external patent attorneys.

General and administrative costs decreased by $434,326, or 17%, in 1996. This reduction resulted primarily from the 1995 relocation of corporate headquarters from New York to the Company's existing facility in Alachua, Florida.

Depreciation and amortization expenses decreased by $190,415, or 35%, in 1996 due to the absence in 1996 of depreciation of New York facilities following the 1995 closing, a write-off of certain leasehold improvements, as well as reduced depreciation relating to the Florida operation.

Net interest income increased by $195,200 in 1996, reflecting the higher level of investable funds in 1996. In addition, the Company had higher interest expense in 1995 relating to interest on the convertible debentures issued by the Company in February 1995 , and converted into Common Stock by July 1995, and a note that was paid in full.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The Company has had no sources of recurring revenues and has incurred operating losses since its inception. At December 31, 1997, the Company has an accumulated deficit of $72,069,727. The Company has financed its operations with public and private offerings of securities, advances and other funding pursuant to a marketing agreement with Bausch & Lomb, research contracts, license fees, royalties and sales, and interest income.

The Company had working capital of $1.9 million, including cash and cash equivalents of $4.4 million, as of December 31, 1997. On February 4, 1998, the Company completed a private placement of convertible preferred stock and warrants that generated $ 5 million in gross proceeds. Management believes that existing cash and cash equivalents combined with anticipated cash inflows from investment income, R&D grants and proceeds from sales of the drug substance for Lotemax and Alrex to Bausch & Lomb will be sufficient to support operations through the first quarter of 1999. The Company is continuing to actively pursue various funding options, including additional equity offerings, strategic corporate alliances, business combinations and the establishment of product related research and development limited partnerships, to obtain the additional financing that would be required to continue the development of its products and bring them to commercial markets. The Company's success depends upon many factors that are beyond the Company's immediate control, including market acceptance of Lotemax and Alrex, competition, and the ability to obtain additional financing. There can be no assurance that Lotemax or Alrex will achieve market acceptance or that the Company will be successful in obtaining additional financing or commercializing its product candidates.

During 1997, the Company raised additional equity of $5.8 million through the issuance of common stock, convertible preferred stock and warrants. All net proceeds were available to fund the Company's operations. Pursuant to the U.S. Marketing agreement with Bausch & Lomb and following the NDA submission for Alrex, the Company received in March 1997, an additional $ 1 million in advances against future sales of the active drug substance (needed to manufacture the drug), $ 143,333 of which was advanced to the license holder. Cumulative advances from Bausch & Lomb as of December 31, 1997 total $5 million. Bausch & Lomb will be entitled to recoup the advances by way of credits from future sales of Lotemax, Alrex and line extension products. The Company may be obligated to repay such advances if it is unable to supply Bausch & Lomb with certain specified quantities of the active drug substance.

The Year 2000

Management believes, based on available information, that it will be able to manage its Year 2000 transition for systems and infrastructure without any material adverse effect on its business operations, products or financial prospects. There can be no assurance, however, that a failure to resolve any issue relating to such transition would not have a material adverse effect on the Company.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

The information called for by this Item 8 is included following the "Index to Financial Statements" contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None.



To: yosi s who wrote (849)5/26/1998 9:16:00 PM
From: crysball  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1491
 
My first Lotemax Prescription

"Nothing worthwihile is ever easy " and obtaining Lotemax must be worthwhile based on the effort it took to convince the Opthamologist [3 calls] and 4 trips to the pharmacy [Revco] before the wholesaler finally delivered to their warehouse.

Unfortunately, Yosi my flatbed scanner is down, but transcribed the the full description of Indications & Usage from the B&L insert as follow:

Lotemax is indicated for the treatment of Steroid responsive inflamatory conditions of the palpebral and bulbar conjunctiva, cornea, and exterior segments of the globe, such as allergic conjunctivitis, acne rocea, superficial punctate keratitis, iritis, cyclitis, selected infective conjunctivitides when the inherent hazard of steroid use is accepted to obtain an advisable dimunition in edema and inflmation.

Lotemax is less effective than Prednsione Acetate 1% in two 28 patient controlled clinical studies in acute anterior Uveitis where 72% of patients treated with Lotemax experienced resolution of anterior chamber cells compared to 87% of patients treated with Prednisone acetate 1%.The incidence of patients experiencing clinically significnt increases in IOP was 1% with Lotemax and 6% with Prednisone Acetate 1%.

Lotemax should not be used in patients with who require a more potent cortecosteroid for this inidcation.

End of Indications & Usage section.

Will try to send the information on Contraindications, Clinical Pharmacology, Adverse reactions, Warnings, etc later......or alternately pehaps Pharmos could scan the Lotemax & Alrex label onto the website (presuming no copyright issues are involved).....but didn't see any show stoppers in the other sections of the label.

In retrospect the Uveitis study [an indication not requested by B&L or PARS] seems like a waste of time which delayed the prduct reaching the market.......but did result in a wider indication on the label.......while costing PARS at least 6 months of cash burn and an additional private placement when they could least afford it........but who ever said the bureaucratic FDA could be sensitive to a struggling biotech company.

Look forward to your response and hopefully the return of David Israel Rosen who contributed much to this thread.

Best Regards, and please excuse any typos.

Neil