SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Creative Labs (CREAF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: burn2learn who wrote (11390)5/22/1998 12:08:00 AM
From: BZOOKA  Respond to of 13925
 
Creaf in Singapore over $20.....EOM



To: burn2learn who wrote (11390)5/22/1998 12:17:00 AM
From: Dennis G.  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 13925
 
Isn't audio and/or video integration on the chip is likely to lead to the same result as the Pentium Pro, which had the on board cache? It's a nice concept but the yields are lousy because you have to have both parts good to get one good chip. What's the payoff?

Dennis



To: burn2learn who wrote (11390)5/22/1998 12:59:00 AM
From: Jon Tara  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 13925
 
I think that noise is going to be a very challenging issue in integrating an audio chip onto a CPU. I don't think that you can put an audiophile-quality sound system onto the CPU chip.

There also are components in an audio chip that are quite real-estate hungry (D/A, volume controls, though the latter could be done in a DSP).

But the biggie is noise. Look at recommended board layouts for audio chips. Try to put a split ground-plane under a CPU *and* get all the digital signals in and out. Good luck!

I don't think it can be done. Oh - it can be done, but not suitable for high-end.

Of course, with P-II packaging, Intel could put audio on a separate die, and even build a shield around it. That's certainly how I would do it.

If Intel is bound and determined to do this - Creative should be trying to sell them that die.