Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Tusk Energy (TKE) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: grayhairs who wrote (481)	5/22/1998 2:25:00 PM
From: Ed Pakstas	Respond to of 1207

Grayhairs... For the record... I personally find that your intgrity is in full tact, in my books... BTW, I have been thouroghly enjoying your disussions with those of similar knowledge... To those of use "Not in the know", I feel that there is a lot to gain from same... I certainly hope the knowledgeable ones continue on.... ...ed

To: grayhairs who wrote (481)	5/22/1998 3:16:00 PM
From: Diamond Daze	Respond to of 1207

Grayhairs I don't say a lot but I read every thing you post. I do so because I can tell there is knowledge , integrity , wisdom in what you say. I can tell you know this gig , I do not. Thanks.

To: grayhairs who wrote (481)	5/22/1998 4:22:00 PM
From: kingfisher	Respond to of 1207

Hi Grayhairs,I appreciate your comments,observations,insight and hope you continue contributing to SI for a very long time.Tusk ended this week strong at $1.94.The next several weeks promise to be very exciting times for Tusk.If my assumptions are correct we may see $3 on this stock within two months. Richard

To: grayhairs who wrote (481)	5/22/1998 5:33:00 PM
From: Robert McCullough	Respond to of 1207

Grayhairs, please stay on the thread!!! I am not in the oil business, but I was a director of a small oil & gas company for 10 years. I find your comments to the point and well thought out. YOU are a Major contributor to this Thread. I am sure there are many, like myself who get plenty from the discussions and comments even if we adding very little input. PS.. My hair is white...

To: grayhairs who wrote (481)	5/22/1998 11:43:00 PM
From: Michael M. Cubrilo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1207

Grayhairs, I would also prefer to see you keep posting on the thread as I am always up for a good debate and am interested in anothers' point of view. I still have many years ahead of me to accumulate more knowledge, but have also seen a few things in 11 years. You obviously have a production engineering background which is useful for these discussions. As far as the integrity goes... it is much more important when one knows who you are and you have a reputation to guard. Once you have accumulated the wealth that you desire, much of the drive, ambition or "fire in the belly" is no longer about the money... it is about the game or the challenge involved in the "chase". Posting under an alias will always leave some doubt as to credibility.... there is nothing wrong with that. A while back you indicated that some of my postings were inaccurate or misleading and I have defended them, and my integrity. The difference is that anyone can e-mail or phone me and know my identity.... I have nothing to hide. What are you hiding? Continue on Grayhairs.... lest you be accused of leaving the ring and throwing in the towel. Or, does your ego not allow you to continue an information dialogue with 'small time' players? Remember, all the 'players' on these threads are potential investors and some of these threads are monitored by regulatory bodies and securities firms. Looks like another stock market darling, recommended by many ANALysts, YBM, has been exposed as a mafia infiltrated scam. Another TSE listed high flyer. These security regulatory bodies and some analysts, are a joke. Maybe its not ALL the analysts that are starting to lose credibility... maybe its just the 99% of them that give the rest a bad name. mike

To: grayhairs who wrote (481)	5/23/1998 5:45:00 PM
From: Michael M. Cubrilo	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1207

Grayhairs, since some of your notes are directed in my direction in your response to Teevee, I have the following comments. Depending on the game that the TKE participants are playing, it is possible to try and throw the "dogs off the trail". The question is whether the key players would be forthright and state that they have an "uneconomic well" or that they have a technical release which tells investors enough to be able to ascertain that they actually have something of significance. (Many years ago, some companies performed "closed chamber drill stem tests" to avoid letting the story out of the bag. However, this also screwed up test results and interpretation of those results and many GOOD wells were deemed uneconomic and abandoned simply because a closed chamber test is not, in itself, a very good test) The only way investors can understand the release, it to understand its meaning from a technical perspective. On the Bearcat thread, you indicated that you are totally out of the play (sold all your shares) because you could not see anything from the releases or from your knowledge of the play that would entice you to remain a shareholder. However, you indicated that even though you were no longer a shareholder, you would still hang around and comment on the thread. Hmmm... interesting, ... I think I remember you attacking me for commenting on this thread while not being a shareholder? A bit hypocritical? That's ok, I forgive you. Yes, I will wait for more news because if this play turns out to be a success, it is of such magnitude for such a small company like TKE, that there will be opportunity to buy in and make large returns. Perhaps not at todays prices, but there will be opportunity. Also, the chart will show accumulation and a rising share price on LOW VOLUMES before the news. PS: good description of DST and reservoir evaluation on the Bearcat thread by yourself. mike