Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: KipferlMeister who wrote (32371)	5/23/1998 11:23:00 PM
From: Matt C. Austin	Read Replies (7) \| Respond to of 35569

The following note is from C L: ------------------------------------ I expect A D to finish the IPM funding pretty soon. It will be interesting to see how these negative idiots try to put a bad spin on that. The mining industry as a whole is hurting so bad that's it's near impossible to raise even small amounts of cash, especially for the juniors. I had a good laugh yesterday, was visiting with a metallurgist in PHX that is working on the extraction problem. I asked him why mining engineers just can't seem to get a grasp on what is going on with these companies. I told him about the moronic comments being made by thall and others in these threads. He's not real enamored with mining engineers to start with so I didn't expect much. Real simple he says, it's not a mining problem, it's chemistry/metallurgy -- how could an untrained person be expected to understand what's going on? You can't see it yet, but there has been a very subtle change in the atmosphere surrounding the believability situation. We've won over another person in govt. and we may have some more coming along behind him. Hang in there gang, we're going to be just fine. Now IPM can get back on track with Bateman and get the resource definition finished.