Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : CSHK CASHCO MANAGEMENT Y2K -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Don Pueblo who wrote (2703)	5/24/1998 11:30:00 PM
From: jhild	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7491

You know TLC, I can hear some yapping coming from the Yahoo kennels. The Chihuahuas, seem to be absorbed with the possibility of my having a relationship with Tony Boyden. I was thinking maybe we should start a thread for Tony and see who shows up. Surprisingly, the question is asked as though there is some relevance to the questions being raised about CSHK. As though the lack of company disclosure and reporting is somehow made OK by the possibility of my having a relationship with him. "I know, let's say that jhild has a relationship with Tony. That way we won't have to answer the questions about the company. We can make jhild the issue." Always the questioner with these people, never answers to the questions themselves. So what does CSHK not answering the question of what state the Merced that they have an agreement with have to do with the silly possibility, for the sake of illustration only, that say Tony was my cellmate transvestite lover. So why won't the management tell us what state Telanis is incorporated in? Would they, if I were to say that I have had no relationship with him? Or only, if I have had a relationship with him? Would they tell us whether there are any felons (Tony or others) associated with CSHK or any of their subs as an employee, contractor, major shareholder, etc.? Or would the answers to those questions then be dependent on whether I was free of foot fungus or some other nonsense? Would they tell us who is going to manufacture the wood pulp pussy potty filler either for that matter? Will they ever stop questioning motives, and relationships, rather than just answering the questions? Maybe better send over some kibbles.