Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Dell Technologies Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Meathead who wrote (44684)	5/25/1998 1:14:00 AM
From: Mr. Aloha	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 176387

>So to summarize, the bears are WRONG. There IS a market for leading edge, it's healthy, it's the most profitable and it's not going to shrink or go away.< Yes, there is a market for leading edge, it's healthy. Yes, it's the most profitable and it's not going to shrink. Those are all true. I think the problem is.. you're focusing on a certain percentage of computer users and I'm focusing on the other. It's a know fact that PC prices are falling and the high-end machines only account for a small fraction of total sales. I'm talking about the MAJORITY of computer users in America. The small to mid-size companies. They don't blow their money on technology that will be norm in 6 months etc.. Like I said earlier, I've seen numerous company upgrade and they bought mid-range computers. Schwab in Honolulu upgraded recently and they DO NOT spend the time and energy transferring machines down the employment chain, they sell/donate the old equiptment. There's no need to insult each other. Aloha

To: Meathead who wrote (44684)	5/25/1998 9:29:00 AM
From: rudedog	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 176387

Meathead - Another generally accepted dynamic is that as a vendor shifts focus to the left side of the curve, excellence of execution becomes more and more critical to success. The profit curve is almost exponential as the curve heads toward the leading edge, so the closer a company can get to that edge, the better their margin. Dell's execution model combined with a very savvy marketing strategy is one of the reasons they have been able to maintain and even grow margin despite what happened to CPQ, IBM and HWP last quarter. CPQ's model has been to 'surf the wave' - i.e. pick a point just a little back from the edge where their current execution model plays, and make it up in volume. This has obviously been less and less successful as Dell pushes in from the left. CPQ will either have to make a big change in execution strategy (hard to do) or change the overall mix of what they are doing to reduce the impact of this segment of their business on overall profits (the direction they seem to be taking). You are certainly correct about where the purchasing decision is made for the high end gear. Financial metrics are applied later in the cycle even for mainstream products, high end products are determined primarily by utility value. This is even more true of server products, where the decision is most often made by the database or ERP consultants - 'this is what you gotta have to achieve your desired service level'. As we have seen, both CPQ Dell have also been doing things to provide those decision makers with more ammunition to counter the financial guys - programs like the back-end buyout of older equipment (with the money applied as a discount to new purchase) allow the departmental buyers to fit higher end hardware into their existing budgets. This type of program has a big advantage over a program which just takes a tax write-off - the tax benefit goes to some corporate account and therefore does not affect operational behavior, whereas the discount hits the buying department's P&L directly.