SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Tokyo Joe's Cafe / Societe Anonyme -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: JEB who wrote (145)5/25/1998 7:28:00 AM
From: Adivino  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 8798
 
Just information:

______________________________________________________________________

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

LITIGATION RELEASE NO. 15733 / May 7, 1998

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. GOLDEN EAGLE INTERNATIONAL, INC., RONALD A.
KNITTLE, MARY A. ERICKSON, GREGORY G. VERNON, TIMBERLINE CONSULTANTS, INC., AND PAUL B.
VERNON, Civil Action No. 98-Z-1020 (D. Colo.)

The Securities and Exchange Commission today filed a micro-cap market fraud case involving the securities of Golden Eagle
International, Inc., a mining company headquartered in the Denver, Colorado area. Named as defendants are Golden Eagle, its
president Ronald A. Knittle, a director and wife of Knittle, Mary A. Erickson, Gregory Vernon and his company Timberline
Consultants, Inc., who acted as public relations consultants to Golden Eagle, and Paul B. Vernon. All of the Defendants reside
in the Denver, Colorado area.

Specifically, the complaint alleges that Golden Eagle, Knittle, Erickson, Gregory Vernon, and Timberline Consultants engaged in
a scheme to falsely tout the stock of Golden Eagle from late 1994 through mid-1996 in a series of public statements making
unfounded claims concerning Golden Eagle's mining business. As a result of the scheme, Golden Eagle stock traded at prices as
high as $6.25 per share in the over-the-counter markets. At the same time, Golden Eagle realized at least $662,000 from the
sale of its stock into the markets.

The complaint also alleges Golden Eagle made false filings with the Commission, and was delinquent in its filings with the
Commission, and failed to keep required books and records. The complaint further alleges that all defendants except Golden
Eagle sold unregistered Golden Eagle stock. It charges that defendant Paul Vernon acted as a nominee of Knittle in connection
with the sale of unregistered Golden Eagle stock and along with Knittle, filed a false schedule 13D concerning his ownership of
Golden Eagle stock.

The Complaint seeks orders permanently enjoining: Golden Eagle, Knittle, Erickson, Timberline, Greg Vernon and Paul Vernon
from violations of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act") and Rule 10b-5; Golden Eagle,
Knittle, Erickson, and Paul Vernon from violations of Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 ("Securities Act"); Timberline
and Greg Vernon from violations of Section 17(b) of the Securities Act; Knittle, Erickson, Timberline, Greg Vernon, and Paul
Vernon from violations of Sections 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act; Golden Eagle, Knittle, and Erickson from violations of
Sections 13(a), 13(b)(2)(A), and 13(b)(2)(B)(ii) of the Exchange Act and Rules 13a-1, 13a-11, 13a-13 and 12b-20; and
Knittle and Paul Vernon from violations of Section 13(d) of the Exchange Act and Rule 13d-1.

The complaint also seeks accounting from Knittle and Erickson; disgorgement from Knittle, Erickson, Timberline and Greg
Vernon, and penalties against all defendants except Golden Eagle.

Simultaneously with the filing of the compliant the Commission brought administrative and cease and desist proceedings against
Alfred Peeper, Charles F. Kirby, Gene C. Geiger, and Edward H. Price in connection with an unregistered distribution of
Golden Eagle stock. (See Securities Act of 1933 Release No. 7538)



To: JEB who wrote (145)5/25/1998 12:50:00 PM
From: Dave Gore  Respond to of 8798
 
Jeb, thanks for the short info on PUMA, but do you have any info from the last few days.

Shorters have stocks on their watch list and pour in to an issue when volume and price goes up. When it hit $8.00, the # could have swelled up by 100 times what it was. Is that why the stock had no follow through when it closed above 8?

You info above is meaningless really. See what I mean?

It's good to know if shorters come in every time it hits $8.00 and knock it back down a point. If we know the volume (i.e # of short days) then we know how much volume we need on the LONG side to start a short squeeze. So this may be a good investment or it may be stuck in a trading range, 6-8, even though fundamentals are pretty good.