To: the dodger who wrote (1623 ) 5/26/1998 8:23:00 AM From: Matthew F. Kern Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 2011
Dodger: I agree about the possibility of killing the bull market with Y2K remediation failure on a widespread basis. My personal thoughts include the need for laws to hold irresponsible executives accountable for failure to fix Y2K. I don't think it's a done deal that the market will crash however... Whatt about this: Buy the people with Y2K compliance who will clean up the failed competitors, perhaps buying them at pennies on the dollar. The winners will still have working software and accounting, the failures will not. Again, I am not certain, but the strategy may be sound if your favorite company is prepared for it. As for ZITL VIAS, I would rather do IAIC as well. CAST cum UNICAST is pretty stable with a 15 year history. After several rounds of fine tuning translation cases, the rest flies. There is no need for check & recheck of final product if tuning was accomplished well. You ought to go see it in use. However there is plenty of labor in analysis, test, setup. IAIC has direct billing employees of course, and your point on labor is a good one. All the extraordinary earnings talk has it's points, but almost every contract in the software services business is in the same category. Almost all last only a few years, some as little as 1 or 2. Entire technologies often come and go in 1 to 5 years these days. A company like IAI can turn this extraordinary situation into a step up to a large stable business base. Step 1 is acknowledging that you are doing that. As for CA & turning position into contracts into revenue, IAI is moving along on target. There will be truckloads of money moving through IAI in the next few months as far as I can see. The CA connection is real and working from where I am watching. IAI looks like a good buy at 10-15 to me. CR and others predict a surge in price. All IAI has to do is offer solid plans for post 2000 and make itself a well known company. ....................Matt