Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Arcane Lore who wrote (47351)	5/25/1998 10:29:00 PM
From: Kurt N	Respond to of 55532

But were those other companies that the SEC filed for a court order to demand that they file their delinquent finacials halted?? Seems to me the most effective way to force a company, that is delinquent, to file financials is to halt the stock. Reason being 'financials not made available to investing public'. Any company that had any respect for shareholders would file the financials. I'd love to see an court order demanding that RMIL file it's overdue financials, but I don't see what effect it would have if any for non-compliance that is. What is the penalty??? Another halt??? If thats it, I'm afraid I wouldn't be able to tell the difference. I can see it now. "Ah a court order. That's entirely different. We didn't care when the shareholders wanted financials, but now you want them. Sure we'll file. We promise that we will have them next week....1 week later...we meant next week." This company isn't in compliance with Rule 15c2-11 so it can't be quoted on the OTC-BB. Kurt

To: Arcane Lore who wrote (47351)	5/25/1998 10:49:00 PM
From: Kurt N	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 55532

It just dawned on me. If a court order is not obeyed by a certain date, the corporate officers could be found in contempt in court AND go to jail. I intend on writing a letter asking the SEC to do this (get a court order). If enough shareholders do then the corporate officers will have a 'personal' incentive to file the financials. Kurt

To: Arcane Lore who wrote (47351)	5/26/1998 7:47:00 AM
From: TLWatson59	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 55532

A.L. Not to be picky, just accurate, the 10Q filed 3/31/97 was for the period ending 6/30/96 not 3/31/97. The filing date was reported as 3/27/97. From the SEC Filing: <CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT: 19960630 FILED AS OF DATE: 19970327> This would make Olympus Ventures, now Rocky Mountain International, far more delinquent in its filing status. Not that it really makes that much of a difference, since factual information is to be denied by so many on this thread. Only fantasy and DD as supplied by the company is what should be believed and contrary information and views are documented as "bashing", short seller affinity and association, or Mork and Mindy devious plots.