SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : DELL Bear Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Moominoid who wrote (858)5/26/1998 2:39:00 PM
From: Bilow  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2578
 
Hi David Stern; The subjects of options as pay for employees
and buy backs in lieu of dividends are distinct.

That the buy backs are more efficient than dividends, there
is no doubt, particularly when the market does not place
a premium on dividends.

On the other hand, it is impossible to reasonably argue that
companies shouldn't expense the cost of paying employees
with options. Taken to its logical conclusion, a company
could eliminate all its labor costs by simply replacing
everybody's pay with stock options.

Hmmm. I suppose you'd have a problem that employees
would be unable to predict their income. This could be
eliminated by simply giving them very short term options
(i.e. 1-day), which have to be exercised or left to expire
each day. A simple accounting package will keep track
of whether the employees have received more or less
than the intended pay rate, and the option amounts for
the next day could be accordingly adjusted. Or give
the employees put options as well as calls... For this
sort of pay to not be included in the labor expense of
a company is directly contrary to generally accepted
accounting principles.

But when the GAAP people tried to get high tech to
expense options on the income statement, high tech
squealed to the US government, which basically told
GAAP what to do. And we complain about the
accounting practices of SEA companies...

-- Carl