Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : PLFM - Undervalued with great potential -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: BIG EYE who wrote (2988)	5/26/1998 12:34:00 PM
From: blessed	Respond to of 9096

Repost of a previous message: o: BIG EYE (2970 ) From: blessed Tuesday, May 26 1998 7:16AM ET Reply # of 2989 Good Morning BIG EYE, For the past 2 weeks, you have been hounding this thread with continual negative posts, raising hypothetical questions, degrading this co., its management, calling it a scam, etc. I personally offered to get answers to any questions you may have, and you politely declined saying you were not interested in investing in this co. But still, you continue with your defamatory remarks. I do not believe, that if there are any problems, with the PLFM delivery systems, that they cannot be overcome. On a much simpler level, as a contractor, when I encounter problems and need a painter, I call a painter, a plumber, I call a plumber, etc. With all the technology available today, an era in which we keep people in space for extended periods of time, I am sure any problems PLFM may encounter can and will be solved. The potential benefits of this system will demand that its eventual success be insured. No one would throw away a potential billion dollar idea because of such simplistic problems as how long can the craft stay airborne on 200 gallon of fuel. That would be ludicrous. I would personally like to know why you have paid the subscription fee to come here to this thread and attempt to create doubt, and to scare weak investors out of this co. According to your profile, since joining on May 12, you have concentrated on this thread, but again, admittedly, do not plan to invest. This to me indicates a submersive agenda. I believe its time for some more DD. Since I have previously told you who I am, where I live, etc., I ask you to do the same. Respond to me privately, You say everything you have said is true, its time to be accountable. Your credibility is now the issue here. Again, as before, no flames are intended, only in search of the truth. Anxiously awaiting your response. Blessed --------------------------------------------------------------------- I'm Still Waiting. Blessed

To: BIG EYE who wrote (2988)	5/26/1998 1:06:00 PM
From: Yongzhi Yang	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 9096

LPE'S ENGINE CONSUMES ABOUT 4 GALLONS OF FUEL PER HOUR I have been reading all the negative posts during the long weekend. It started to bother me a little bit. So I decided to call LPE today to get to bottom of it. I called (304)-291-3843 and talked to Mr. Darus Zehrdack. The main question I had was whether the plane can indeed fly for 48 hours with 200 gallon of fuel. (Shame on me for not even thought about this question during the research period. Well I am not familiar with aviation industry -- I guess that's a good excuse.) Mr. Zehradack couldn't tell me exactly how long the plane can fly with 200 gallon of fuel since it depends on the weight of the plane, the position of the communication payload, etc. But he said normally at cruise speed the engine consumes 4 gallon of fuel per hour. 200/4 = 50 hours. Of course, the plane will consume more fuel during take off period. But the 48 hour (or even 40 hours is fine with me) estimation should be right. Mr. BIG EYE, as a "POTENTIAL INVESTOR" spending so much time on this board. I would suggest you to pick up your phone and call LPE. Since you have experience on aviation industry, you can ask a lot more question then I do. I would appreciate it if you could post the facts you find during your discussion with LPE. Thank you. yongzhi

To: BIG EYE who wrote (2988)	5/26/1998 1:20:00 PM
From: Pinky	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 9096

Yes exactly... The fuel control unit enriches the mixture and leans it depending on the condition of flight. There are DIFFERENT mixture settings for the same altitude depending on the engine rpm etc. Big, you sound like a psychopathic liar I know, truths and half truths and lies all rolled up. A person like that can get away with alot, unless they are continually confronted. Almost always people move on....I'm done. I think it's time to give you some rope.