SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : LORAL -- Political Discussion -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Grainne who wrote (119)5/26/1998 3:19:00 PM
From: halfscot  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 880
 
OT Fair Enough. I'm not averse to seeing all drugs decriminalized at the adult level. By then adults should have the mental capacity to judge for themselves what chances they want to take. If they're stupid enough to take drugs and off themselves then more power to them. I like Darwin's theory of evolution.

The point about Tobacco is, now this is important, it is a totally legal product. As such they are allowed to market it any way they want within the confines of the law, which they have done. What's wrong with market research to expand their market as long as it's legal? Every other co. takes great pains and expends millions to make their product more palatable, appealing, etc. Specifically targeting kids w/tobacco is wrong but what kid do you know who doesn't want to be an adult? Almost all marketing in one way or another targets kids. Either make tobacco illegal or leave them alone to operate within the confines of the law as they have done. Make the laws more strict, whatever, but don't come back at them after they've obeyed the law and demogogue the issue into a victimization project. BTW raising the price of cigs will not reduce teen smoking. They get over 2/3rds of their cigs from their parents as cited by CBS. The poorest Americans are the highest percentage of smokers and they can least afford the punitive price/tax increases. The cynic in me sees this as a humongous money/revenue grab by the gov't. for more wasteful spending by bureaucrats.

As far as the difference being that tobacco is so addictive...if that's the standard to be used for persecution then let's go down the list with alcohol leading the pack. O.K. the alcohol co.s don't lie about the addictivness of their drug, something I found the tobacco co.s to be really stupid about doing, but everyone with an I.Q. above that of a pea pod knows the addictivness of tobacco and has known for years. Other candidates for addictive possibilities for future persecution/civil litigation: McDonald's (high fat foods are addictive and is Ronald McDonald really that much different than Joe Camel? Early onset of heart disease), sugary cereals (heavy promotion to kids causing early addiction to sugar), gambling (all those ads on TV and lotto), sex (Victoria's Secret catalogs, daytime soaps, billboards, ad infinitim), you get the picture.

Beer co.s will be the next target for the marketing victimization money grab to 'protect our children'. I've seen Budwizer trucks w/"Beer School" on the side. Wait till Waxman gets ahold of this-"a school to teach our kids how to drink, blah, blah, blah!"

Sorry for the length.

halfscot