SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : India Coffee House -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mohan Marette who wrote (909)5/26/1998 4:17:00 PM
From: LoLoLoLita  Respond to of 12475
 
re: More tests.

Mohan,

This is exactly what I was saying. They will need more tests!

The Russian statement on the minimum number required is probably good. But remember that the purpose of a test is to see what happens. It may happen that one or more of the tests fail to deliver the expected outcome. If that happens, redesign/reengineering and revision of the computer models would be needed, and then the tests would need to be repeated. This could take a long time!

If any major problems are encountered, the time to resolve them could be measured in years. Certainly not weeks.

David



To: Mohan Marette who wrote (909)5/28/1998 1:34:00 PM
From: LoLoLoLita  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 12475
 
Re: Pakistan Tests. Why 5 in one day?

Mohan,

Maybe the answer is already posted here. All I've seen today is Reuters.

Any news on why they test 5 at once? Theories:

1. they have developed more than one type of *weapon*, having gone all the way to weaponization, and are testing them all at the same time.

2. they were afraid of a dud, so they're testing more than one
(but different kinds) at the same time so that at least (hopefully) one will go off.

Pakistan can't have a H-bomb. Am I right?

These must be plutonium implosion devices like we used at Trinity and Nagasaki. Much simpler than an H bomb. Most everything you need to know is in the public domain anyway.

David