Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Golden Eagle Int. (MYNG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TokyoMex who wrote (3527)	5/26/1998 10:44:00 PM
From: David Sirk	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 34075

The Sooner Joe takes his pump and dump crowd with him the better. But I will make it no matter what! Joe is in for the Short term. I will feel much better when he gets all the way out and moves on!

To: TokyoMex who wrote (3527)	5/26/1998 11:10:00 PM
From: Money Maker (MM)	Respond to of 34075

TM, this is your good news from Bolivia? MM

To: TokyoMex who wrote (3527)	5/26/1998 11:33:00 PM
From: Diamond Daze	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 34075

Dear sir , I have watched your quite impressive picks. IMHO it is obvious you have a great gift and quite a following, (I may join). I have looked through the SEC filings and read their web site , I assume your knowledge past mining stocks and their claims was the reason you covered a good part of your position today. I was not able to find a gram per ton average on these "samples ". There was mention of shutting down the under ground mining operation and doing a low grade high tonnage deposit by the company's own admission this is a placer deposit . It would take the even dispersion of gold through out this " filled in valley to be profitable of a minimum of 1 gram a ton ( Thats a big twelve dollar a ton ore base , they better be real effecient to bring that in to production) Now what if the gold is not evenly dispersed and it runs hot and cold say 6 grams here and no gold for 50 feet and then the dreaded nugget effect is brought in on top of that?. I have seen this theory before , I have heard the reasons why not to drill before , and usually it leads to a bullshit story. If they indeed have 6 million oz proven how can they prove that on trenching ??? how can they claim 78 million inferred on pit samples ?? lets see a 100 ton leach pad and 100 ton samples pulled from around the property under third party verification, if that proves I will buy too. If their intent is just to set a wash plant up or a concentrator then possibly they could mine for less without leach pads. I would really like to see third party verification from a Major that this is real....If it is..the majors would be breaking their doors down now...This just looks far to good to be real , where is the catch ??I think it will be in the grade and retrieving the "free gold"...IMHO When you talk to the company tomorrow could you please ask them for the grades and tonnage calculations...and perhaps the total number of shares outstanding in the company and post that here...Thankyou.. Cheers