SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : KERM'S KORNER -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kerm Yerman who wrote (10917)5/27/1998 11:06:00 AM
From: Kerm Yerman  Respond to of 15196
 
MARKET ACTIVITY / TRADING NOTES FOR DAY ENDING TUESDAY, MAY 26 1998 (3)

TOP STORIES, Con't

Commodities Feel Asian Heat
Turmoil in Indonesia adds to pressures on worldwide prices

The Financial Post

Economic and political uncertainty in Asia are back on the front burner and commodity prices are feeling the heat, with various indexes hitting five-year lows in recent days.

The latest factor to raise uncertainty is the change of power in Indonesia with Suharto resigning as president in favor of B. J. Habibie.

The turmoil in Indonesia and fears of an escalation of the region's debt crisis have beaten down the global prices of oil, metals and agricultural products.

"You can trace a lot of the problems we've seen in commodities to what's going on in Asia," said Doug Porter, senior economist at Nesbitt Burns Inc. "The setback delivered another body blow to prices."

The Goldman Sachs commodity index, heavily weighted to energy prices, hit 157.39 points Wednesday, a day after crude oil touched a 10-year low of US$12.98 a barrel on the New York Mercantile Exchange.

The Goldman Sachs index recovered slightly at the end of the week, but remains 31% below its 1997 high.

Oil prices have suffered from other factors, including oversupply and poor demand resulting from a warm winter in the northern hemisphere but the downturn in Asia is a big negative, said Teresa Courchene, senior economist at Toronto Dominion Bank. Prices have fallen about 40% in the past year and 12% in the past month alone.

The TD commodity price index, to be released next week, is expected to show a drop of about 3% in May, sending it to a five-year low. The index is weighted according to the value of commodities exported by Canada. May will show weakness "across the board," Courchene said.

Base metal prices have turned down in recent weeks, with nickel and copper off 12% and 9.5% in May. "Again, a lot of that weakness has to do with the Far East," said Patricia Mohr, economist and commodity specialist with Bank of Nova Scotia.

Mohr prepared Scotiabank's May commodity report, also due out in the coming week, and said the numbers look poor. The picture is unlikely to brighten over the summer when demand typically declines.

The weakness in prices is widespread, analysts said. The Commodity Research Bureau index of futures prices, weighted to agricultural products, hit a 4 1/2-year closing low of 219.75 Thursday and briefly dipped below 218 Friday.

The renewed slide in commodity prices has followed Asian equity markets lower. Both had managed first-quarter rallies after sharp declines beginning last fall.

The South Korean stock market, for example, is down 39% since March 1 after gaining 38% in the first two months of the year. Signs of recovery are few.

"There were expectations at the beginning of the year that prices were set to snap back," said Mohr. "Now we'll have to wait until later in the year for signs of a recovery."

Subodh Kumar, equity strategist at CIBC Wood Gundy Securities Inc., predicted it will take another six months for demand to pick up and commodity prices won't see a recovery until 1999.

Forestry and gold stocks, which are already up 22% and 9% on the year, don't look to be attractive buys. However, the oil sector, which is down more than 5% in 1998, is now "interesting for people who are willing to wait."

Nesbitt Burns's Porter sees weakness across the entire resource sector. "It's really just a matter of who'll be least weak."

Oil Price Casts Shadow Over U.S. Majors

Prolonged weakness in world crude prices may force major oil companies to trim their capital spending plans for 1998 and may imperil ambitious plans to increase production, analysts say.

So far, only Amoco Corp. (AN) has cut spending. It announced last month that it would trim by $340 million, or eight percent, its planned 1998 capital spending of $4.2 billion.

The rest of the majors said they remain confident.

Exxon Corp. (XON), the nation's largest oil company, plans a 10 percent increase in capital spending over 1997's $8.8 billion, and Mobil Corp. (MOB - news) plans around $5.9 billion, up from $5.1 billion.

Also, Chevron Corp. (CHV) has reaffirmed its commitment to a $400 million increase in capital spending to $6.3 billion, and Texaco Inc. (TX) is sticking to plans for a rise to $3.8 billion from $3.5 billion in 1997.

However, analysts say that most spending plans were formulated in the glory days of $20-per-barrel-plus oil at the end of 1997. With oil sloshing around world markets, especially in the United States, the world's largest importer, pressure on prices has lasted longer than anticipated.

After flirting with $17 per barrel in March following an agreement by OPEC and other producers to cut 1.5 million barrels from world oil output, West Texas Intermediate crude is now stuck in the $14-$15 range.

Although the majors have deep pockets and debt levels are the lowest for more than a decade, analysts say that cashflow this year will be crimped by low prices and more may be forced to follow Chicago-based Amoco's lead.

''If oil prices do not rebound, even Exxon will have to look at cutting capital spending; the only company that is safe is Royal Dutch/Shell (RD.AS)(UK & Ireland: SHEL.L),'' said Fadel Gheit, analyst at Fahenstock & Co.

Also, the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, or OPEC, and other producers who agreed to the output cuts which sparked a brief oil price rally, appear more willing to talk than act ahead of another OPEC meeting in Vienna in June, analysts say.

The majors stress they are long-term investors and note that oil has historically traded in a $18-$21 range.

The response from Mobil is typical.

''We continue to review our capital budget, but there is no plan to reduce overall spending for 1998,'' said a spokesman for Mobil.

Texaco also says it is sticking to capital spending targets, adding that its projects are tested at $15.00 oil.

Eugene Nowak, analyst at ABN AMRO Inc., says that if oil prices recover in the third and fourth quarters after the OPEC meeting, then the majors will likely ride out the short-term pain.

But if there is no agreement, Nowak said that ''even the larger companies will get a little more cautious.''

''Some companies cut from the bottom up and have delegated a lot of authority to field managers...The longer the oil price stays low, the more production will be shut in, although that primarily affects 'stripper' wells in the U.S. with 10-15 barrels per day of production,'' he said.

He notes that the majors are willing to put up with a rise in debt levels to fund share buybacks, increased dividend payments and investment if they believe that 1998 is going be a transitional year.

Some projects are also delayed for reasons outside the control of companies and production forecasts made by the big companies are close to the best-case scenario.

Nowak noted that unforeseen problems such as equipment failure could mean that output is delayed, for example, in the giant Hibernia field offshore Newfoundland, Canada. Texaco also has been hurt by equipment failure at its North Sea Captain Field.

''Many of these projects are in areas of the world which are difficult to operate...The Tengiz project in the Caspian has made great progress, but the prospects for a pipeline have slipped to the year 2000 or 2001,'' he added.

Tengiz, a Chevron-led project, aims to raise output from 160,000 barrels per day in 1997 to 250,000 bpd in less than three years, but needs a pipeline to ship crude out in large quantities.

Tengizchevroil, the operating company, said this week that it had asked shareholders Mobil and LUKArco to pitch in more cash for development as low oil prices are impairing development plans. LUKArco is a venture between Russia's LUKoil and Atlantic Richfield Co. (ARCO) (ARC).

Energy Service Companies Cast Eager Eyes South
The Financial Post

Canadian energy service companies are focusing on the U.S. oilpatch to expand operations and mitigate the slowdown in this country.

Higher margins in some cases, different business cycles and a wider client base are some reasons behind the flow of Canadian technology, people and money south of the border.

Eneterc Resource Services Inc. is the latest firm to broaden its U.S. presence. It is paying an undiclosed price for New Orleans-based Extend Seismic Processing LLC, a private firm that specializes in marine and three-dimensional seismic data processing. The deal was two months in the making. The sheer size of the U.S. market attracts Canadian firms, said Peter Ryder, Enertec's vice-president of finance and chief financial officer. "We see this as a very powerful platform to start growing our U.S. processing business by virtue of this combination."

Another factor is the U.S. moves on a slightly different cycle because gas prices are generally stronger and less volatile than in Canada. This is particularly true of the Gulf of Mexico area, which accounts for all Enertec's marine seismic activity, providing a stable base of large customers who can weather commodity dips. "There would have to be a protracted downturn for both oil and gas before they started pulling the reins in," he said.

Fracmaster Ltd. has made several acquisitions in the past six months, boosting its share of the U.S. pressure pumping market to about 10%. The company can expect returns of 25% or better before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, in Texas, Louisiana and New Mexico, president Les Margetak said at the recent annual meeting.

"We've seen tremendous growth from virtually very little revenue in 1996," he told shareholders.

A well testing and directional drilling firm, Computalog Ltd., is on the hunt for more U.S. purchases after making seven in the past 18 months.

President and chief executive Doug Robinson said the deals helped increase its U.S. market share to 23% from 2%. It now operates in eight states, up from three or four before the buying spree. "When we started to look at the size of the U.S. market, it was just too big to ignore and that's when we decided we just had to get a bigger presence and become a bigger player to survive."

The Achilles heel of operating in Canada is the second quarter, when the spring thaw makes moving equipment difficult and drilling activity dwindles, he said.

About 28,000 wells will be drilled this year in the 50 U.S. states, 10,350 of them in Texas, Louisiana and Arkansas, said Cameron Plewes, service firm analyst with Sprott Securities Ltd. in Calgary.

Companies targeting the U.S. are relying on internal activities or acquisitions to expand their businesses, he said. "Time will tell which provides the greater measure of success, but for the moment it appears to be equal."

Ranger Oil Turns On Oil Taps At North Sea Columba E Oil Field

Canada's Ranger Oil (RGO/TSE) will start up its new Columba E oil field in the North Sea on Monday May 25, a spokeswoman said on Friday.

The field will come on stream at 9,000 barrels per day (bpd), the spokeswoman added.

Ranger has delayed the start of its new 20,000 bpd Kyle field from November this year to early January 1999.

Nova Corp Included In Alberta Lawsuit
The Financial Post

An Alberta Court of Queen's Bench judge has ordered Nova Corp. and Nova Gas Transmission Ltd. be added as defendants in a $155-million lawsuit involving gas marketing subsidiary Pan-Alberta Gas Ltd.

A group of Canadian natural gas producers is suing Pan-Alberta, claiming that, for years, producers' gas was diverted from the sales stream to help Nova's pipeline network fulfil delivery commitments and that led to lower revenue for producers.

The producers also claim that during price spikes, their interests weren't at the top of Pan-Alberta's agenda.

Nova is selling its stake in Pan-Alberta and readying itself for a megamerger with TransCanada PipeLines Ltd.

"It has absolutely no impact on the merger," said Nova spokeswoman Lisa Neiles, adding the company wouldn't comment further on the litigation.

Nova took an $85-million write-down last year, in part based on the value of its Pan-Alberta Gas assets.

The lawsuit was originally filed by nine natural gas producers, but in a court decision last fall, Court of Queen's Bench Justice Kenneth Moore directed the lawsuit be prosecuted on behalf of all 425 natural gas producers.

The latest ruling means producers can pursue claims against Nova based on allegations it controlled the actions of Pan-Alberta, was an accessory to the alleged breaches of contract and fiduciary duty by Pan-Alberta, interfered in their relationship with Pan-Alberta and their economic interests.

IPL Sets June Pipeline Capacity Rationing

IPL Energy Inc. unit Interprovincial Pipe Line Inc. said on Friday that apportionment for heavy crude oil on its Canada-U.S. pipeline system would rise slightly in June from this month's level.

Nominationed light crude volumes were to be less constrained than in May, however.

IPL said apportionment for Line 3, which carries mostly heavy crude to Superior, Wisc., from Edmonton, Alberta, was set at 14 percent for June, compared to 13 percent in May.

Apportionment is the volume of oil IPL expects to move on its system subtracted from volumes nominated by its shippers.

Lines 2 and 13, which carry mostly light crudes to Superior, were apportioned at five percent for June, down from 10 percent in May.

As with the last several months, Line 1, the pipeline that carries natural gas liquids and refined products, required no apportionment, IPL said.

In calculating apportionment for June, IPL did not need to revert to the Historical Average Procedure (HAP) because nominations were not high enough to trigger the plan.

Under the procedure, used to combat chronic overnomination to secure space, shippers are restricted to moving crude volumes equal to historical levels if nominations exceed 115 percent of the capacity on any of the adjacent pipelines.

The low June apportionment comes as IPL is forced to reduce its throughput on some lines because of its extremely high crude inventories, especially in the U.S.

IPL spokesman Alan Roth said total system inventories are currently at about 1.9 million cubic metres (12 million barrels), which compares to a normal level of about 1.4 million cubic metres (8.8 million barrels).

To help ease the glut, IPL cut throughput this week on Line 2 by 31,450 barrels a day and Line 3 by 18,870 barrels a day, Roth said.

SPECIAL REVIEW - CHEAP OIL
ABCNEWS.

Barrel Fever

Six months of cheap oil has put more money in people's pockets.

Whether you fill up your car's gas tank, shop for your family or run a business dependent on fuel or oil products, low prices make many households and companies run more smoothly.

"Sure, it makes life a little easier," says Sheila Kujava, partner at Green Bay Floral in Wisconsin. The 65-year-old family business runs two delivery trucks regularly and four on busy holidays like Mother's Day.

Cheap fuel keeps costs are under control, Kujava says, unlike in the 1970s, when high fuel and transportation costs pushed some florists out of business.

Oil prices have declined steadily since early October, sliding from almost $23 a barrel on Oct. 3 to $13 in March-a drop of about 40 percent. Since then, they've been hovering around $15, over $4 lower than last May. Gasoline prices are down to just over an average of $1 per gallon, about 15 cents less than May1997. Global Forces Push Prices Down

The economy, stocks and consumers have been reveling in cheap fuel, energy and petroleum products. Cheap oil hasplayed a key role in bringing employment down to 4.3 percent in April (a 28-year low) and price inflation to negligible levels. It's also helped fuel economic growth to a 4.2 percent annualized rate for the first quarter.

For American consumers, the benefits of cheap oil have been felt in a variety of ways, says Charles Hatcher, assistant professor of housing and consumer economics at the University of Georgia. "Lower oil prices are good news to everyone."

Consumers can thank a variety of factors for bringing oil prices down, says Stephen Smith at Dain Rauscher Wessels. One is increased output from OPEC nations, including a boost in exports from Iraq, which has have been under United Nations sanctions that restrict output. Another was the warm winter weather caused by El Ni¤o, which weakened demand for heating fuel as supply increased.

Also significant was the drastic weakening in the economies of China and other Asian nations, Smith says, which have been accounting for half the growth in worldwide energy consumption.

Not only are some Asian economies struggling badly, which means less demand for oil products, but their weak currencies limit their purchasing power abroad.

Benefits: Obvious, Hidden

Low crude prices mean prices of staple products such as heating fuel and gas for the car are lower. Consumers feel the effect directly on their wallets.

In addition, low oil prices can cut other products' prices or keep them from rising. Oil is used in a wide range of products such as plastics, cosmetics, toothpaste, clothing and drugs. With oil products not rising in price, the final product is cheaper tomake.

Cheap oil helps businesses keep energy-a large component of industrial production costs-and transportation costs down, too. As a result, prices on anything from corn to steel have had less reason to go up.

More broadly, the low inflation environment helped along by cheap oil has contributed to steady interest rates. And a stable rate picture is a key part of America's robust economic growth and Wall Street's continuing bull market.

Keeping an Eye on Oil

It's no surprise that oil prices have a big influence on consumer habits. "Consumers are very sensitive to oil prices," says Delos Smith, senior business analyst for the Conference Board, which publishes the Consumer Confidence Index and other economic indicators.

The 1970s oil rationing is still stuck in people's heads. Highoil prices make people anxious and angry, while cheap oil prices boost consumer confidence, which continues to be remarkably strong across the country.

That's a very different picture from the energy crisis-filled 1970s and '80s.

"When we started in 1975," says Bill Thompson, owner of J&S Delivery Service in Dallas, "we had a price increase every six months just to keep up with the increase in the price of oil." Thompson says the low oil prices of the past few years have helped him keep package delivery and freight rates the same since 1991.

Oil Prices' Impact Mixed

Some consumers benefit from cheap oil more than others. Commuters feel the biggest impact, says Delos, enjoying low prices at the pump for their long trips to and from work.

Low-income households, which spend a greater portion of their income on staples, also benefit. And stockholders-a growing portion of the population-are being rewarded with profits boosted by low costs and low interest rates.

On the other hand, says Hatcher, workers in struggling segments of the oil industry face a dismal employment picture. Communities dependent on oil production, for example, may also be hurt if rigs are shut down.

Oil prices are being watched by everyone-carpooling moms, small business people, economists and investors-with a hand on their wallet and an eye on inflation.

Con't



To: Kerm Yerman who wrote (10917)5/27/1998 11:34:00 AM
From: Kerm Yerman  Read Replies (15) | Respond to of 15196
 
MARKET ACTIVITY / TRADING NOTES FOR DAY ENDING TUESDAY, MAY 26 1998 (4)

CHEAP OIL, Con't

Predicting Pump Prices

Fred Maxwell, whose company operates 148 wells in East Texas, wants oil prices to rise.

"A year ago, my bottom-line profit was 25 percent [of revenues]," Maxwell says. "Right now, it's not. It's zero."

Maxwell's Mustang Operating Co. has had to shut down 12 wells since January because he can't afford to repair them. He's had to lay off two field laborers from his 14-person staff. "It's just a rough period of time to get through," says Maxwell, who's been in the drilling business for a quarter century.

While Maxwell's business will improve if the price of oil rises-he's hoping for $17 or $18 a barrel rather than the $14.50 he's getting now-other parts of the economy will more likely suffer.

In fact, economists warn of higher inflation rates and higher unemployment rates when the price of oil rises.

Political Problems Pose Threats How bad will it get? Petroleum pundits differ, but the consensus is that it will take political destabilization in several oil-producing countries to cause a catastrophic rise in the price of oil.

Even if a price rise isn't catastrophic, it will cause hardship.

The higher cost of gasoline, heating oil and other fuels means that consumers will have less money to spend on other items, lowering their standard of living and cutting demand for other goods, says Gordon Richards, an economist with the National Association of Manufacturers.

As power and transportation costs rise, businesses will suffer, too, Richards explains, citing the patterns of earlier oil crises. Businesses will likely have to raise prices, sparking inflation. The government will fight that inflation by using higher interest rates to tighten the money supply.

While inflation might subside, businesses will have to cut costs by laying off employees, resulting in higher unemployment rates. "That tells the story pretty much as it happened in the 1970s," Richards says.

What's Behind Possible Boost?

The question is, what will drive oil prices up, and when? The most likely scenario, analysts say, starts with lower supply. Producers around the world are holding back on increasing supply because it's uneconomical. Or, as in Maxwell's case, operators won't even maintain current capacity.

It's also possible that the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Companies (OPEC), which agreed to cut output earlier this year, will decide to make further production cuts in June.

Meanwhile, demand is rising, partly encouraged by lower prices and partly by worldwide economic growth, though troubles in Asia have made it slower than expected.

"It looks very much like the markets are correcting as we speak," says Arthur L. Smith, CEO of John S. Herold, an independent petroleum information services company. "By this time a year from now, we could be looking at a much tighter market."

Where prices will eventually end up is probably about $5 more a barrel than they are now, says Stephen Smith, an oil analyst with Dain Rauscher Wessels. But that won't have a significant hit for people at the gas tank, he says, since each dollar per barrel amounts to 2 1/2 cents per gallon of gas-a total of 12 or 13 cents.

Low Risk of Catastrophic Rise

A catastrophic rise, observers say, would stem only from political instability affecting several oil-producing nations-a regional war, for example. "The risk would be another international incident, maybe in Russian oil-producing regions," says Gary Thayer, senior economist with A.G. Edwards & Sons.

"If we were to see a lot of that taken off the market, that would be a real problem."

But given the importance of oil money to Russia and other parts of the former Soviet Union, "we think the probability of them allowing something to happen there is still pretty low," Thayer says. "They need the revenue from the oil."

A conflict in the Persian Gulf wouldn't create a crisis in the U.S. the way it did during the OPEC oil embargo of the early 1970s, says Henry R. Linden, director of the Energy and Power Center at the Illinois Institute of Technology.

"The world oil market is so efficient," he says, "every time one of these happens, the impact is less and less and less. The downward pressures [on the price of oil] are greater than the upward pressures over the next three to five years."

Crude Awakenings

Cheap oil takes a chunk out of oil companies' earnings.

It cuts costs for consumers and businesses, but today's low prices make it harder for the oil biz to fatten its bottom line.

Individual oil companies have no real control over the fluctuating price of oil, so a sustained period of cheaper-than-average oil cuts into revenues and margins. And low prices don't just affect the companies that must sell their products with smaller price tags.

Cheap oil also gouges companies that are involved in the exploration, production and refining of oil and those that offer drilling services and equipment.

Oil Stocks a Volatile Bunch

When oil prices started to slide in October from almost $23 per barrel of crude to around $15 in February, oil industry stocks plummeted right along with them.

Oil price fluctuation is one reason why oil stocks are a volatile bunch. So far this year, each oil sector trails the gains made by the S&P 500.

While the outlook for 1998 is generally gloomy, oil prices are up from their $13 low. The main fallout from low oil prices may be over and efficiency gains in the industry help minimize damage. Analysts say some sectors can still please investors even if oil prices don't rally.

In many cases, earnings will decline this year compared with 1997, according to Baseline Research. The hardest hit will be oil exploration and production companies. The integrated oil companies, which do everything from exploration to marketing, will also suffer. On average, the refining and marketing sector should post modest earnings gains. The best performance is expected to come from the drilling and services sector.

Good Well Hunting

Exploration and production companies are most directly affected by oil price changes, so it's no surprise that E&P-petro-lingo for exploration and production-stocks declined last year and are struggling to stay in positive territory in 1998.

Revenue for E&P companies is, in a general sense, price-multiplied by how much oil the companies produce. Lower prices mean less revenue and smaller margins, which goes almost straight to the bottom line. And less spending than planned by the major oil companies also shrinks revenue, says analyst William Featherstone at Schroder & Co.

"All the earnings will be down," says analyst Benjamin Rice at Brown Brothers Harriman. For the Baseline E&P group of 144 companies, earnings are expected to decline 46 percent. But wildcards like Iraqi production can tousle predictions.

Analysts recommend that investors should focus on E&P companies that have significant natural gas operations. Those companies are less vulnerable because pricing for natural gas is stronger. And after being tanked by El Ni¤o last year, demand for natural gas should be even higher than in 1997, says analyst Robert Christensen at Gerard Klauer Mattison.

Because almost half of natural gas goes to industrial activity, continued economic growth will also point to healthy demand and earnings growth for natural gas operations.

Big Oil - Lower Risk

Because the major oil and gas companies do a bit of everything, they're hit by cheap oil just like all the other sectors.

Oil prices cut Baseline's global integrated oil group of 26 companies to "only" a 22 percent gain last year and a solid, but S&P-trailing gain in 1998.

The integrated companies are being hit hardest in their exploration and production operations. Demand for refined products will increase, but it can't make up for the revenue lost because of cheap oil, says analyst Paul Ting at Salomon Smith Barney. Many have chemical businesses, which will also see little or no growth in 1988.

Because of the combined cheap oil-related problems, 1998 earnings are going to be lower than those in 1997. But after a weak first half, the sector should begin to strengthen.

The group has improved their operations and balance sheets in the past several years, too. "Major integrated oil companies are in the best financial shape ever," says analyst Fadel Gheit at Fahnestock & Co. As a result, they are better positioned to deal with cheap oil and should see significant improvements when oil prices rise again.

Drilling For Profits

Companies that provide drilling, equipment and services to major and independent oil companies were Wall Street's favorites before oil prices tanked.

Last year, the Baseline group of 95 companies still managed to rise 51 percent, compared with the S&P's 32 percent gain. Despite strong earnings projections and some merger activity, the group is up only slightly in 1998.

These companies contract out their services for periods ranging from weeks to years and earn what the major oil companies choose to spend. When the big players feel the pinch of cheap oil, they may trim their spending. The drilling, equipment and services group will feel some pain.

But spending in the sector should be a solid $90 billion-plus in 1998, says analyst Paul Chambers at Lehman Brothers. As a result, earnings growth should be strong-19 percent is expected for the group-in part because there have only been about $2 billion in budget cuts resulting from cheap oil prices.

The best performers in 1998 will be deepwater drillers and related equipment and services companies. Deepwater contracts are longer and their pricing has remained firm, says analyst James Van Alen at Janney Montgomery Scott.

The reservoirs are huge and potentially very profitable, which attracts the attention of the major oil companies. With deep pockets and long-term perspectives, the majors won't slash spending because of a pricing slump.

Gas Guzzler's Revenge

Cheap oil spoils companies and consumers alike. "Fuel economy isn't on their mind," says Wayne Satterwhite, sales manager at Haynes Jeep & Eagle in Richmond Virginia.

He says people shopping for the ever-popular, gas-thirsty sport utility vehicles aren't thinking about fuel efficiency, unlike auto buyers of the 1970s. "In the gas crunch in 1973 and '74," Satterwhite recalls, "then people were really fuel-efficient-minded to a fault. But now they've adjusted to the low gas prices."

The upside of months of low oil prices is economic growth, low inflation and cheaper fill-ups at the pump. But the downside, according to energy watchdogs, is that consumers forget the lessons of fuel efficiency and energy conservation. And companies too are relying on cheap energy instead of becoming more economical about energy use.

The 1970s and '80s energy crisis made people more aware of the consequences of energy use because of the pain it inflicted. With the temporary comfort of cheap oil, some of those considerations have been pushed aside.

Wallets Benefit, Not Greens

The impact of cheap oil is fast. Pressure on wallets that pushes people to use less energy or find cheaper and environmentally friendly energy sources has eased. Alternative energy sources, already suffering from weak demand, are even less popular.

Cheap oil means businesses can put off costly equipment changes because energy costs, which can make up a big part of the production bill, shrink themselves. All those factors can have a negative impact on the environment and energy efficiency efforts.

"If a commodity is cheap," says Joseph Minott, executive director of the Clean Air Council in Pennsylvania, "people tend to not think very carefully about how they are using it."

Cheaper fuel means more driving, especially on summer vacations. Bigger cars like sports-utility vehicles are more popular because they're less expensive to gas up. Consumers are also less likely to factor energy cost into appliance purchases and home heating decisions.

And cheap oil and gas also make it harder to get people talking about the benefits of conservation, Minott says, unlike when prices were much higher. "I remember during the Carter administration when we had those long lines at the gas pumps," he says, "we were always thinking about saving energy."

Americans Hitting the Road

More driving-it looks like a big summer for trips in the car combined with warm temperatures make for a poor pollution picture, says Linda Urata, executive director of Project Clean Air in the San Joaquin Valley in California.

Not only will carbon dioxide emissions increase, but nitrogen oxide emissions will go up too, creating more smog and ozone that can be kept close to the ground on hot days.

Business and industry are no better than consumers.

In the 1970s and 1980s, businesses were forced to become more energy-efficient to reduce their costs. As they cut their energy use and energy bills, they improved their bottom lines and became more competitive. Now, energy improvements have slowed, says Russell Sturm, executive director of the International Institute for Energy Conservation, and the economy is more dependent on energy.

Too Reliant on Energy?

"We're building an infrastructure on oil prices that are unsustainable," says Sturm. "It's a pretty vulnerable position to be in."

Countries like Germany with higher oil and other energy prices, Sturm says, have more energy-efficient economies. And they won't feel as much economic pain as the U.S. when oil prices go back up.

Low oil prices have made life easier for many Americans. And there has been great progress in energy efficiency and reducing environmental side-effects since the oil prices were this low decades ago.

Sports utes, for example, aren't the gas guzzlers of 1970s Detroit. But watchdogs urge that environmental and conservation considerations become a greater factor in people's decision-making, even before higher prices make it a necessity.

U.S. Quiz

How slick is your oil IQ. Slide Tru this quiz and find out.

1. What state uses the most petroleum per person
a. Alaska
b. California
c. New York
d. Texas

2. In what year did oil prices reac their peak this century
a. 1929
b. 1973
c. 1978
d. 1981

3. The United States consumes as muc petroleum as
a. Brazil
b. China
c. Germany
d. Brazil, China, Germany, Japan and Russia combined

4. The worlds largest oil tanker is as long as
a. Distance between Dallas & Houston
b. Four football fields
c. Height of the Empire State Building
d. Tad less than the love boat

5. In 1998, how much is U.S. oil demand expected to increase
a. 0.4%
b. 1.8%
c. 3.7%
d. 5.0%

6. What accounts for 1/2 of the 18.6 million barrels of oil the United States uses every day
a. Automobiles
b. Chemicals - plastics manufacturers
c. Farm equipment
d. Power Generation

7. About how of the oil Americans consume is imported
a. 10%
b. 25%
c. 50%
d. 75%

8. What country does United States import more oil from
a. Saudi Arabia
b. Canada
c. Iran
d. Venezuela



To: Kerm Yerman who wrote (10917)5/28/1998 10:58:00 AM
From: Kerm Yerman  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 15196
 
MARKET ACTIVITY / TRADING NOTES FOR DAY ENDING WED, MAY 27 1998 (1)

OIL & GAS

Gasoline slumps on unexpected API build

NEW YORK, May 27 - An unexpected build in U.S. gasoline stocks reported by the American Petroleum Institute late on Wednesday sent prices reeling down, traders and analysts said.

''Overall, it (the API data) falls into the bearish category ... particularly for gasoline'' said Nizam Sharief at Hornsby & Co.

The API showed a hefty gasoline build of 3.232 million barrels to 125.72 million, contrary to the expected drawdown of 1.35 million barrels by traders and analysts polled by Reuters.

''At this time of the year there should have been a draw but instead we saw a significant build in inventories,'' Sharief told Reuters.

The market had predicted a drawdown amid healthy gasoline demand, for the long Memorial Day holiday which passed last Monday, which traditionally kicks off the summer driving season.

''I am somewhat disappointed in terms of gasoline demand,'' Sharief said, adding that the implied demand was at 8.0 million barrels per day (bpd), or half a million short of the overall summer demand projections.

As a result of the data, gasoline futures on the overnight ACCESS trading on NYMEX lost around 0.60 cents per gallon to 49.35 cents, but later recovered slighlty to 49.45 cents.

Tom Bentz, trader and analyst at Cresvale International said he saw gasoline futures shedding around 0.50 cent on the data, and heating oil losses around a quarter penny.

''On distillates, a seasonal build is within expectations,'' Bentz said.

But the API reported a slightly larger than expected build of 1.69 million barrels compared to forecasts of 1.4 million.

''The API is bearish on both heating oil and gasoline, and neutral on the crude,'' Bentz said.

Crude stocks actually fell 3.6 million barrels to 349.53 million, contrary to forecasts of a stockbuild of 2.55 million barrels for crude.

Analysts had expected a build amid a continuing strong phase in imports, but API's draw resulted with a huge fall in stocks on the West Coast, they said.

Padd 5 fell 2.793 million barrels, while stocks in Cushing, Oklahoma (Padd 2) rose 604 million.

''If half the draw comes from the West Coast, it does not leave much for the rest of the country,'' Sharief said.

He added that the API stockdraw should also have been larger considering it reported a large drop in crude oil imports of 990,000 barrels.



World prices edge upward in a soggy market

LONDON, May 27 - World oil prices edged slightly upward on Wednesday but the market was subdued as further signs of global oversupply weighed on prices, oil traders said.

Brent crude futures were up six cents from Tuesday's close at $14.20 a barrel by 1842 GMT, having clawed back from an intra-day low of $13.99 a barrel.

Some traders attributed the bounce to technical buying after Tuesday's heavy selling and said there was no fundamental reason for the rebound.

Crude oil inventories have reached five-year highs in both the United States and Europe, traders said, with commercial storage facilities on both sides of the Atlantic nearing capacity.

The glut comes in spite of a March pact reached in Riyadh in which members of the Organisation of the Petroleum Exporting Countries agreed to cut two percent from global supply in an effort to shore up prices.

Earlier on Wednesday, former Saudi Oil Minister Sheikh Zaki Yamani said in remarks in London that OPEC would have to cut output again to stabilise prices when it meets in Vienna on June 24.

Yamani said in a speech presented at an oil company conference that if the producer club wanted to stabilise Brent at around $14 a barrel, then it would have to restrain output to 27 million barrels a day.

A Reuters survey for April pegged output output by the 11-member OPEC at around 28.2 million bpd.

Crude oil inventories, meanwhile, are surging throughout much of the western hemisphere.

Commercial oil stocks in the European Union and Norway rose to end-April levels of 348 million barrels, their highest level since March 1993, according to Jan Stuart, editor of monthly oil fundamentals guide Oil Market Intelligence.

May stocks, bolstered by crude oil markets in which price values for future supplies are higher than for prompt supplies, should see a continuation of the trend, analysts say.

London-based Energy Market Consultants forecast a global stockbuild in May of around 50 million barrels for crude and products, combined.

NYMEX Crude Settles Higher

Crude-oil and petroleum-product futures settled higher Wednesday on the New York Mercantile Exchange, buoyed by sharp gains in the June gasoline contract. June unleaded gasoline jumped as bears bailed out of the front-month contract ahead of its expiration Friday. June heating oil was also higher. The American Petroleum Institute's weekly inventory report for the week through May 22 is due out late Wednesday afternoon. Analysts said they expect that gasoline stocks declined by 1 million to 3 million barrels last week. Most expect crude oil stocks to decline, also.

July crude settled up $0.17 to $14.99.

NYMEX Hub natural gas ends down, June expires near lows

NEW YORK, May 27 - NYMEX Hub natural gas futures, pressured by a soft physical market and long liquidation ahead of June's expiry, ended lower Wednesday, then on ACCESS reacted little to neutral weekly inventory data, sources said.

Earlier, June expired 7.8 cents lower at $2.017 per million British thermal units after trading in a range between $1.99 and $2.10. July settled down 7.2 cents at $2.046, then on ACCESS mostly drifted between $2.04 and $2.05 after the weekly AGA report. Other deferreds ended 0.9 to 6.8 cents lower.

''It's (the AGA number) about what we expected. The storage operators are running like clockwork,'' said one Texas-based trader. But he said the growing year-on-year stock surplus was still a bearish factor, likely to soon pressure prices lower.

AGA said Wednesday U.S. gas stocks rose last week by 92 bcf, in line with Reuter poll estimates in the 80-90 bcf range. Overall stocks climbed to 453 bcf, or 41 percent, above a year ago.

Eastern stocks rose 54 bcf and were still 55 percent above last year. Consuming region west storage, which climbed 14 bcf last week, was up three percent from 1997 levels. Inventories in the producing region gained 24 bcf for the week and held at 44 percent over year-ago.

Traders said concerns about milder forecasts next week prompted some longs to bail before June went offthe board.

Forecasts this week call for mostly above-normal temperatures across the central and eastern U.S. Texas is expected to continue hot through the weekend, with a high of 95 degrees F forecast for Houston on Thursday. Cooler-than-normal readings are still expected for most of the West.

But some forecasters are predicting more seasonal weather for the Midwest, Mid-Atlantic and Northeast next week.

Chart watchers said the market was oversold and due for a bounce.

''All the bearish factors are in the market, and everyone's already short. I'm not bearish down here,'' a Midwest trader said.

Technical traders pegged July support at Friday's prominent low of $2.03, which roughly coincides with the $2.025 double bottom from last July. Spot continuation lows at $1.99 and $1.96-1.97 should also stir some buying.

In the cash Wednesday, Gulf Coast swing quotes slipped about two cents to the $2.02-2.07 area. Midwest pipes were three to four cents lower in the mid-$1.90s. Chicago city gate quotes were down two cents to the mid-to-high teens, while New York was little changed in thelow-$2.30s.

The NYMEX 12-month Henry Hub strip tumbled 4.4 cents to $2.288. NYMEX said an estimated 113,697 Hub contracts traded today, up sharply from Tuesday's revised tally of 73,101.

U.S. spot natural gas prices drift lower with futures

NEW YORK, May 27 - U.S. spot natural gas prices turned lower Wednesday, in line with a softer expiring June contract, industry sources said.

Short-term forecasts are calling for mostly above-normal temperatures across the central and eastern U.S. this week, with a high of 95 degrees F expected in Houston on Thursday. Cooler-than-normal weather is expected to remain in the West.

Forecasts for June 1 are anticipating below-normal temperatures in southern Texas and from the upper Mississippi Valley across the Great Lakes states to the Northeast. Above-normal temperatures are expected to cover eastern and southern Florida, northwestern Texas, the Rockies and California.

Physical gas at Henry Hub was quoted today mostly at $2.07-2.10 per mmBtu, while June futures traded at$2.04-2.10.

In the Midcontinent, prices also slipped a little to the mid-$1.90s, with Chicago city gate pegged mostly at $2.16, market sources said.

In west Texas, Permian prices lost three cents to $1.85-1.88, while San Juan prices similarly eased to $1.72-1.78.

Early June business in the Permian Basin was reported done at $1.88-1.92.

In the Northeast, next-day gas at the New York city gate was quoted at $2.30-2.32, while Appalachian deals on Columbia were reported done at $2.19-2.22.

Scheduled maintenance work is underway on Sonat Inc.'s Sea Robin line at the Vermilion Block 149 compressor station. The outage, which is still expected to end this weekend, is affecting about 70-75 million cubic feet per day of supply.

Injection estimates for this afternoon's American Gas Association storage report, according to a Reuters poll, were mostly 80-90 bcf, versus a 76 bcf gain a year ago.

Canadian spot natural gas prices hold mostly steady

NEW YORK, May 27 - Canadian spot natural gas prices held previous ranges on Wednesday as ongoing maintenance outages in the West kept supplies fairly tight, traders said.

Spot prices at the AECO storage hub in Alberta for both day and June gas were talked mostly again at C$1.70-1.71 per gigajoule (GJ). Summer was also reported done at C$1.70.

Storage injections in Alberta totaled 805 million cubic feet per day (mmcfd) on Tuesday, down from 827 mmcfd on Monday.

Field receipts on NOVA were higher at 12.0 billion cubic feet (bcf) on Tuesday.

Also, available interruptible transportation (IT) from the east continued to rise. The allowable IT at the East Gate (Empress/McNeill) will be 70 percent of IT nominated, equating to a cut of 353 mmcfd. This is compared with 34 percent yesterday.

At the borders, Sumas gas prices in the west were quoted unchanged at US$1.37-1.38 per million British thermal units (mmBtu).

At Niagara, prices were steady to slightly lower at US$2.18-2.20 amid a softer NYMEX June market set to expire.

Commentary
ProView
May 28, 1998

Energy markets were up slightly on Wednesday. Most attribute the marginal increase to short covering amidst rumors that the API data would show a draw in crude stocks.

API data released after the close had crude stocks down 3.6 million barrels on the week. Distillates were up 1.7 million and gasoline inventories were up 3.2 million barrels. Refinery runs were up 1.4% at 98.4%.

Most traders believe nearby crude will be locked in the $14 to $15.50 range until OPEC meets on June 24th.

For today, expect prices to remain on the defensive. The overwhelming sentiment remains extremely bearish.

RBC
May 25, 1998 (for week ending May 23rd)

Crude Oil Commentary:
It was a wild ride for crude oil this past week as the contract expired on Tuesday. We saw an initial sell off last Friday and a continuation of sellers (mainly covering recently established long positions) on Monday and Tuesday. The contracts range (as the nearby) was $12.50 to $16.30. There remains little in the way of bullish fundamentals at this point with crude oil stocks more than ample, no important (credible) news from OPEC and little in the way of political uncertainties (with the exception of Asia, whose demand was expected to wane - but at these prices, can afford to buy as much as in previous years).

The technical picture remains neutral. We have made what could be a double bottom, but do not see any major signals quite yet that the downtrend will reverse. So we would remain cautious at this point and continue to play from the neutral side.

Technicals suggest that the lows may be tested again and confirm our view to remain short or flat until the signals change. Don't get long quite yet!

Natural Gas Commentary:
The question is will $2.00 now hold? This remains a solid support level, but fundamentals certainly don't look all that possitive at the moment.. The fundamentals suggest further consolidation and potential weakness, especially if we continue to see stocks build as they have in recent weeks. Fundamentally, there is not much at this point that suggests we'll see a near term rally. Technically speaking, prices are still oversold with strong support at $2.00. The triangle formation that we discussed last week is still holding and, unless we break $2.00, the charts suggest that we will bounce off $2.00 and then see a short term rally up towards the $2.35 level before the end of May. Any takers?

AECO term prices remained relatively quiet this week with summer (Jun-Oct) showing continued signs of weakness, while winter and next summer have held up quite nicely. We fell that we could see further softening over the summer, but believe that winter will remain firm. Our recommendation would be to consider hedging a portion of next summer between $2.25 and $2.40, hold off for now on the winter term or look at a winter over winter extendible.