SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Oracle Corporation (ORCL) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (7204)5/27/1998 2:23:00 PM
From: John F. Dowd  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 19080
 
Excellent Post- Thanks



To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (7204)5/27/1998 4:42:00 PM
From: Eric  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 19080
 
I don't want get too deep into the legal stuff. But I do believe
those companies that compete directly with MSFT do have a case. I
seriously doubt that SQL Server and IE can compete with Oracle and
Netscape if they do not have the backing of MSFT. MSFT is not known
for innovation. If you want to talk about taking eyes off the ball,
MSFT has been doing that for years. However, because of their vast
resource and the leverage on the operating system they are able to
come back once they realize that mistake. Most other companies do not
have that luxury. If you tell me that is not unfair, I don't know what
it is. As far as competitions among Oracle, SAP, and PSFT, they are
fair and square. Oracle is losing the battles against SAP on high end
because SAP has more features. Oracle is losing the battles against
PSFT on low end because PSFT is more nimble. Oracle is stuck in the
middle. As far as I2 and MANU, they are based on totally different
architecture. I don't see why Oracle wants to buy either one of them.
A better strategy would be allowing I2/MANU to plug into Oracle apps
and at the meantime develop their own. That is exactly what Oracle is
doing.

As far as the comparison between Netscape and Yahoo, I don't feel that
is quite accurate. People are blaming Netscape not following Yahoo's
path based on solely the valuation of the two companies now. Let's not
kid ourselves. Netscape has a much higher revenue than Yahoo now. When
Netscape was the size of Yahoo, it was growing faster and the stock
was as hot. I wonder what new things people will say when Yahoo's
stock falls from its current lofty valuations.

-Eric



To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (7204)5/28/1998 8:31:00 PM
From: WTSherman  Respond to of 19080
 
Michelle, the answer to your question "why isn't Oracle..." is easy: LEHFE