Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Bob Brinker: Market Savant & Radio Host -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Skeeter Bug who wrote (5220)	5/29/1998 12:17:00 PM
From: Justa Werkenstiff	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42834

Skeeter: Re: "he said he would tabulate the data on msft and vod if given the details. let's test his/her metal." Sure, he has also held himself out to the world as a woman when he is actually a man. He has also said he has never owned any UTEK but has probably posted over 100 times on the stock price. He has also harassed a number of folks on AOL about Brinker with unwanted e-mail. He has called UTEK investors "pathetic" and "losers." He has further claimed that he has respect for Brinker but only posted something positive after I wrote the post that you just read and after he had called Brinker a "flat out" liar. I don't believe a word Rillinois says. He is as disingenuous as they come. He also claims to be a pure indexer but spends his time bashing Brinker's stock picks like it was a full time job. You want to give him a chance to test his metal with VOD and MSFT? He has already failed. His analysis of UNPH showed his true colors. It was a joke. First, Rillinois says Brinker is in denial over beating the index by individual stock selection which Brinker has never claimed in the first place. But wait. In the same breath, Rillinois says Brinker should have held on to UNPH for bigger gains as opposed to selling for a huge profit. As an indexer who says nobody should be in individual stocks to begin with his thinking is ridiculous and fraudulent. Obviously, he is out to destroy Brinker. But now he comes up with his incredibly bogus reason for being here on this thread like I care. He wants to save us from ourselves. Yes, he paid $125 to join SI just to save us all from the big bad Brinker. He has never posted anywhere else on SI but on this thread to bash Brinker. Yes, he has posted hundreds of times on the internet regarding Brinker because he is concerned for our welfare. Boy, he must think we are all real stupid. He posts endlessly and repetitively. I guess he must think we did not get any point if he had any the first time around. What an arrogant little fellow. But he represents the second coming of Christ in his own mind and he is coming to save us all from the evil Bob Brinker. What a joke. He sole purpose is to bash Brinker endlessly and he will go on and on and on until the doctors get his medication right. Mark my words. It is a lock! So I would personally forget about Rillinois. Let's talk some more about "tinker's damn." This is getting good!

To: Skeeter Bug who wrote (5220)	5/29/1998 8:29:00 PM
From: Rillinois	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 42834

Skeeter, thanks for your support in my attempts to simply get a pair of dates. Is that a truce flag I see not to far in the future?<g> If it is, I would be more than happy to wave it together with you. I want to know what day the actual buy recommendations were made so as to calculate the return of the S & P 500 for the similar periods. This shouldn't be that hard, but it's like pulling teeth with some people. I'm sure Justa and Don Lane know, but they wouldn't want to risk minimizing any potential glory that Bob is currently basking in, would they? From what I've been able to gather MSFT was recommended the first time in October 1990, and Vodafone in 1989. I need verification and exact dates as to when they were purchased. Additionally, I believe he recommended MSFT more than once before he went to a hold rating. The dates of those buy recommendations and the date of the hold recommendation would make the analysis complete. Similarly, I would need the same info for VOD. You're right, Skeeter, it "won't take much time... and it might further expose rillinois objective... or, he/she night surprise us all..." But then again, maybe Justa would just prefer to continue with his antics and innuendo rather than find out the truth. Delay, delay, delay...This sounds familiar. The more I read Justa's posts, the more I'm seriously starting to believe Justa is part of Clinton's spin team. Lanny, is that you....<g> Best Regards. Rillinois