SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : American Eco (ECGOF, ECX on Toronto exchange) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: david james who wrote (2492)5/29/1998 9:28:00 AM
From: MARK BARGER  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2841
 
Hi dave, of course as soon as I close out my position in ECGOF the stock looks ready to take off! Just wondering did Norris keep a low profile at the meeting, as you didn't mention his name. Thanks for the update. I, like Duncan, view my ECGOF ownership as a valuable part of my education as an investor. I wish you guys the best.

Mark



To: david james who wrote (2492)5/29/1998 12:53:00 PM
From: Hawkmoon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2841
 
Thanks David!!!

I kinda figured that the pipeline contract wouldn't commence until this summer due to weather considerations. What we should see is a fast and furious effort to complete construction over the next two quarters before winter sets in again. What that signifies to me is that we should see considerable revenues coming to bear on ECGOF's bottom line during this part of the year.

I must have missed the news/rumours on Pictou. Do you have any references you can provide in order to assess their contribution/effect on ECGOF's bottom line??

Overall, this stock is tremendously undervalued relative to its growth and earnings performance regardless of past disappointments. Even if growth were to fall from the 29% level of last year, there is no way that folks can't say this stock isn't worth at least $15/share.

With the recent bond offering, I fully expect that we may see the stock go through that target this year, especially as it is now complying to US GAAP regulations.

Regards,

Ron



To: david james who wrote (2492)5/30/1998 11:42:00 AM
From: Dan Kelly  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2841
 
Thanks for the information. Any comments about lack of analyst coverage?