SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Dell Technologies Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Chuzzlewit who wrote (45375)5/29/1998 6:06:00 PM
From: Logos  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 176387
 
Buy and Sell vs Long Term Hold:

I've followed both strategies, been an investor and been a maniac day trader. I've come to the conclusion that the strategy most likely to make money without ulcers is a combination. Find a few good companies, ones you can sleep well owning, even if the market is going down. As long as you trust them, always own some shares. If the price runs up and you start getting uncomfortable, sell some shares, but always keep some. If the price drops, buy more, but always keep a cash reserve (or margin reserve if you want). So you're always invested and assuming you picked good companies, you'll benefit from any run-up while avoiding disastrous crashes.

I personally favor a quartile approach. Figure out the maximum amount you would invest in a particular stock. Divide by 4. If the price shoots up, reduce holding to 1/4 of max. If the price drops, go to 1/2, then 3/4, then, very rarely, 1, if the price really tanks. I also keep some money aside for speculative purposes (looking for cure for cancer companies, shorting hyped up companies, etc).

Anybody got any comments on this approach? Anybody do anything similar?

Haz



To: Chuzzlewit who wrote (45375)5/30/1998 11:32:00 PM
From: Paul Reuben  Read Replies (5) | Respond to of 176387
 
Off Topic - I believe you were discussing this topic earlier:

"Study Shows Merit Of Buy-and-Hold"

washingtonpost.com