Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Global Platinum & Gold (GPGI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ed Fishbaine who wrote (6032)	6/1/1998 12:12:00 PM
From: SnakeInATuxedo	Respond to of 14226

"....and a hush fell over the assembled multitudes." Thanks, Mr. Fishbaine. $^)

To: Ed Fishbaine who wrote (6032)	6/1/1998 12:17:00 PM
From: Richard Mazzarella	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14226

Ed, thanks for posting. I have a couple of comments. The technology issues are very exciting and all should be enthused. It would have been nice to see it described in a press release. However, I find the "takeover" discussion distressing and utter nonsense. If management really has control they shouldn't feel threatened to the point of posting that speculation. It just adds to the confusion and uncertainty, something always bad for stock price. Overall, the technical issues are substantive enough to have me just buy a little more stock. Thanks again for posting.

To: Ed Fishbaine who wrote (6032)	6/1/1998 12:23:00 PM
From: Anthony Zack	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14226

Thanks Ed, I will feel really good about these latest developments when we have the following: 1. the number for the value of the head ore 2. receipts from refiners after they have processed the new product Until then, I will have to settle for a warm fuzzy kind of feeling. I do appreciate this latest attempt at communication by the company, although the "invent the wheel" anecdote was unusual. I get the feeling that Mr. Jensen really wants a JV deal to really expand the operation. Is expansion without a JV partner not feasable, or just that it would require too much time to generate the cash for expansion? Tony

To: Ed Fishbaine who wrote (6032)	6/1/1998 12:28:00 PM
From: go4it	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14226

Ed, That is a very amazing letter. There have been efforts to undermine the dirt companies for quite awhile. I hope GPGI will have much better success at subduing the effort than have the others. Although, I will add that Mr. Jensen's comment is out of line in suggesting that none of the other dirt companies have been successful in their efforts especially after announcing that they have switched to the same type of mining technology that Maxam has been working on perfecting for years. I would love to see a major player come into the picture and make a bid that cannot be refused for the company because that would light a match under this entire sector. Keeping my fingers crossed for you guys. Chuck