Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Global Platinum & Gold (GPGI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: go4it who wrote (6050)	6/1/1998 3:29:00 PM
From: Anthony Zack	Respond to of 14226

Charles, I get the feeling that you are holding back, please don't...tell us how you really feel!! Ed, I hear that aloe is good for burns...you can have Russell pick some from the top of the ore pile if you can't get some out east!! Tony

To: go4it who wrote (6050)	6/1/1998 3:33:00 PM
From: Zeev Hed	Respond to of 14226

Charles, I cannot disagree with you. I have been using a "euphorism" of "garbled communications", but frankly, an angered (impoverished?) stock holder could have used stronger words. Zeev

To: go4it who wrote (6050)	6/1/1998 3:58:00 PM
From: Richard Mazzarella	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14226

Charles, something keeps gnawing at me about Jensen's letter comment about those nasty takeover artists that would do a reverse split if they assumed the company. Why would they automatically do a reverse split? It would hurt them as much as anyone else. Seems that the comment is more like "don't go out in the woods today, there's only lions, tigers, and bears, oh my!". Bet they wished they had a poison pill? Frankly I'm glad there is a sense of pressure on management, lots of promises, little delivery over the years. Since the stock's been so cheap, maybe us so call little guys already hold a controlling interest? <VBG>