Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Crystallex (KRY) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Carl who wrote (8754)	6/2/1998 9:48:00 PM
From: Syncrude	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10836

The big difference is that SW is mascarading as producing "news", which they do not, they "create" it. I would hope that you would have noted the difference. You will also have noted that whatever "material" they come up with is one-sided. No effort is made to present balanced views. They also have not stated who their "sponsor" is. Want to guess? Are you also going to tell us that the "garbage" Asensio put out would ever had made it into a real newspaper? Bet you won't, you know very well the legal department would NEVER have allowed it! PS. When you state SW's "reputation" would not be put at risk, I am sure you were rolling on the floor laughing, just as most readers here would! Surely you know that they are known as the National Enquirer of the Internet.

To: Carl who wrote (8754)	6/2/1998 10:09:00 PM
From: E. Charters	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10836

It's not "what we would like to believe". What would you like to believe? If you know it's a lie, what do you believe? If its so slanted that its obvious to a 12 year old and the writer never even phoned Crystallex or is willing to at least tell their side of the story what would you believe? There is other evidence also. Lots. This is not their first time. We are not their only detractors. You got any reason to canonize these guys? echarter@vianet.on.ca The Canadian Mining Newsletter