To: STK1 who wrote (34389 ) 6/2/1998 9:14:00 PM From: elk Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 41046
Charles, How do you assume that they would get a conditional listing? Your not really answering that. Because the company assumed, in your opinion, does not amount to a Hill Of Beans, but Becasue NASDAQ says it it DOES. I think you have missed this point, as well. Every company gets this? Can you please tell me a Single Other Company that you know of that has gone through this process in this manner? Again you are making statements with no support. Charles can you tell me the outstanding float? Do you really take it as a negative sign because this stock does not trade in 50K or 100K blocks? Thats BS charles, and you know it. You are wrong, FTEL was above four since October, until I beleive it dropped under four, in the final days of Dec, 3.75, I beleive that was One day, maybe two. The WCOM announcement a couple of days later moved it to 7 FROM 4, to not 4, so please take some responsibility in what you are saying. Of course EVERY one is anti-dilution, but you are avoiding the issue you raised, about being OTC AND WHAT DILUTION? You are making a very careless statement, and that is Unlike you. What Dilution are you talking about? Again please take some responsibility, because to casual throw about unsupported crap, is truly unlike you. You r Buyback idea is what desaparate stocks do, if you think FTEL is desaparate or in such dire straits, that they need to make a show manuver, then you do not have a good feel for this company, or where they are. Not share price charles, but as a COMPANY. I am averaged in at 2.55, and I have been investing since August, so dont hand me that .50 or 1.00 crap. My money is on the line like everyone's, so what your Point? You dont know what has been Dispensed, well That is crap! Why would you word that like that charles? I find this post and your wording very careless and irresponsible, please Either Clear up what you have said or retract it.