Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Corporate Vision (CVIA) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: K A Anderson who wrote (5422)	6/3/1998 11:18:00 PM
From: gerry	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6654

the judges decision is certainly great news, but, it still the first step. More legal action will surely follow. Lots of questions, too . Do we have the shares to elect all or a lessor number of directors, What percentage of outstanding shares do we control at this time? Does status quo mean that the reg s in on hold? If not, our percentage of stock will change? You will represent us at the stockholders meeting? How many of us can be there in person? What criteria do we use to elect the directors, if we are successful? And who among us should make that decision? We want to be reasonably sure that we do not go from the frying pan to the fire. Or were we already in the fire???? LOL. If CVIA requests and is granted an extension for producing the records, will the shareholder meeting also be changed? ( I only mention this, because I know it is common for defendants under pressure to request delays and extensions which normally are granted, if the judge believes them to be reasonable. Many factors come into play here, though. Each court and judge and state or county can be very different) Just a few questions to throw out there, everyone. I am sure there are many more. It is, indeed, a most interesting and bizarre situation we are involved in. Gerry