Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Engine Technologies (AENG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sir Auric Goldfinger who wrote (509)	6/3/1998 10:00:00 PM
From: Greg Cummings	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3383

Auric, It's as if you're trying to locate the evil in every corner and that's bothersome. When it gets to this point, it's often a reflection of personality, not reality. Someone once said, "Evil isn't as pervasive as the paranoid mind believes". Expert opinion says that this engine works and could quite possible revolutionize an industry. You disregard this information in favor of your quest to, "locate the evil in every corner." Why don't you spend a couple weeks in Colorado. Maybe you'll come back and report that you paid-off some law officer to search the computers for Mr. Travis' driving record. That would be pertinent information to assist us all in our investment decisions regarding AENG. NOT! Bottom line..........I don't care if Mr. Travis is the God Father or if you're Chris B working for Fstock..........All I want to know is if the engine is as great as many of us suspect. So far, the experts seem to be saying it is. In the long run, that's all that will matter. So, why don't you cut out all the "in search of evil" crap and maybe the rest of us will curb our distrust for you (as difficult as that may be......just kidding :-)). Let's all attempt to locate accurate, pertinent information. You never know, we might be able to work together on this thing. Best of Luck, Greg

To: Sir Auric Goldfinger who wrote (509)	6/4/1998 9:58:00 AM
From: PaulB	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 3383

See Auric: The people are not buying this company because it has a 3 million dollar market cap. If you look at the company from the financial fundamentals it would not be worth anywhere near where it is trading. Potential a lot more than it is trading at. When you run your next scam you need to add into the formula the human factor and potential upside. You are not going to be able to convince everyone that what they are holding is what you see. Your view is from an ivory tower and quite frankly most of us view the world from the other side of the planet. You are quite articulate and from reading your post have a high financial IQ. Perhaps it is time to pack it in on this one. I really do feel sorry for the next thread you come to and hope that the SEC takes some form of official act against your type. Admit it you have misjudged your advisory here. I really would like to wish you luck in the future but that would be a lie. So see ya... PS: It is a shame that you waste your talents this way.

To: Sir Auric Goldfinger who wrote (509)	6/4/1998 11:14:00 PM
From: Mike 1	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3383

Dear Auric, In your response (509) to my post (508) your first sentenced said, "Well taken, the man has never called". Question: What man and who is he suppose to call? Regarding more financials: I would think that it would be more appropriate for AENG to come up with the financials than Patterson Travis. I am sure that you are well aware that at this time AENG is not showing any income. How about giving it six months to a year. Regarding research report: I would think that most people would prefer someone like Carroll Shelby or Bob Teague to be doing and writing the research report than any brokerage firm. So far they are both on record, as to their absolute belief in the engine and its potential. It is my understanding that they are both pursuing further research with the engine. I would also think that you might prefer an independent source for research report. I would conjecture that in the not too distant future AENG will have an independent research facility reprot on the engine. In view of the U of W, it would make sense not to announce the when, where, who until it is done. I am sure any businessman would agree. Now how about my question at the bottom of my first post (508).. I can appreciate that some people on this board might not want to give their names, so I will withdraw my question about your name. But, as the new man on the board I cannot understand your reluctance to at least give the company, firm, organization, whatever that you represent. Short sellers or the opposition is not a valid answer. Sincerely, Mike 1