SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Fred Fahmy who wrote (57008)6/3/1998 10:31:00 PM
From: puborectalis  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
So he's right for the wrong reason....the bottom line is that he was right and we were wrong.(Long on Intel since late 96.)



To: Fred Fahmy who wrote (57008)6/3/1998 11:09:00 PM
From: Orhan Birol  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
What are you? A statistician? What is the value of predicting the earnings if you cannot even predict the direction of the stock. Aren't we here to sell high and buy low or vice versa.



To: Fred Fahmy who wrote (57008)6/4/1998 12:26:00 AM
From: TTOSBT  Respond to of 186894
 
Fred, Re: >"Right about what?? Earnings are what I am interested in.....he is completely clueless when it comes to projecting Intel's earnings. His statement that Merced's slip insures that Intel will not make its 1999 numbers is absurd. It really underscores how little he understands Intel's pipeline of products."<

Right you are. That's why it's a false correction everyone falsely following Krulak's manipulation. Only the earnings will settle the score.

TTOSBT