To: don pagach who wrote (4180 ) 6/4/1998 10:18:00 AM From: Sam Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 9980
Don, Thanks for posting all of the articles you have found. "In emerging markets all over the world, the drama is repeated. Investors who chased high short-term interest rates with short-term loans in recent years are calling in their loans. In just about every case, the I.M.F. is urging a heroic defense of the currency through draconian interest rate increases, sometimes backed by bailouts, sometimes not." The truth is that no currency can be defended very long by interest rate boosts alone. These are just quick fixes. If there is no real underlying productive capacity, it will just lead to runaway inflation or depression, depending on whether the government prints enough money (and manages to get it into circulation) to allow the resultant exorbitant debts to be paid off or not. Personally, I am coming to agree with Jim Rogers and the folks on Capital Hill who want to shut down the IMF. It makes absolutely no sense to me to continue this charade. It is just another bailout of banks who didn't do their due diligence, speculators who bet wrong, and corrupt governments. I have a lot of respect for Bob Rubin, but I can't go along with him on this one. Mexico was one thing, but those guys were unimaginative angels compared to the Asians and Russians. Mahatir's ranting about currency speculators and foreign interests coming to "own" Asia is ridiculous. He wasn't complaining when the currency markets were allowing him to peg his currency to the dollar; they were the same "evil" speculators. This is absurd. All these guys thought that they could emulate Japan: create a few huge fortunes by exporting forever to the corrupt, fat West, while throwing a few extra bones to their toiling masses to keep them getting a little wealthier. They weren't building a real national economy, they were fortune builders. There is a difference. Karl [bleep], where are ya' when we really need ya'?