Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: MulhollandDrive who wrote (15604)	6/4/1998 3:01:00 PM
From: DMaA	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 20981

Starr now 11 to 1..... This isn't a loss, just a foul tip into the stands. The administration gets to drag out their agony. Whoopy ding for them.

To: MulhollandDrive who wrote (15604)	6/4/1998 5:04:00 PM
From: Zoltan!	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20981

>>Starr now 11 to 1.....Supremes refuse to hear SS and Attorney/Client privilege claims before appellate courts..... Not a total loss - Starr deftly cornered them and put them on record. And now not even the imbeciles like Bateman can claim that it's Starr that's drawing out the investigation. This corrupt bunch in the WH bunker is on record cheering delay. Think of all the starving children that could have been fed with the money the Clintons are causing US to waste just to postpone their inevitable reckoning. So greedy, so selfish. So corrupt. So Clinton.