SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : TSIG.com TIGI (formerly TSIG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: JEFF BERRY who wrote (1059)6/4/1998 10:37:00 PM
From: The Perfect Hedge  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 44908
 
Below is a question I want to answer....

I saw your post on SI about MM trying to short TSIG. Where do you get the information from?I only have 2,000 shares, does that help if I ask my broker to physically deliver the shares to me?

I think many on this thread have commented on the obvious mm manipulation of the stock.Marty has expressed this several times and I as well.The stock drops on seemingly light selling.The mm's are doing what they want with this stock and many other bb stocks.The bb is known for outrageous mm manipulation.

I think every share counts and even 400 shares being taken delivery of will send a mssg to the mm's....

B



To: JEFF BERRY who wrote (1059)6/4/1998 10:39:00 PM
From: The Perfect Hedge  Respond to of 44908
 
Jeff-
I am going to ask Gordon about your concerns in your last post.I believe many of your questions were answered today with my and gambler's post.Now it's just a matter of time until the pp comes to fruition.

As far as the CCI deal coming undone;no way.It ain't gonna happen.

B



To: JEFF BERRY who wrote (1059)6/4/1998 10:46:00 PM
From: gambler  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 44908
 
TSIG walks away from the entire transaction.

Why do you continue to TALK about the deal with CCI not being done?

Do you honestly think after all the time and effort and money TSIG has poured into this deal that they will just drop it just because they earned $500,000 instead of $800,000 last year?

This is absolutely absurd. Business is based on the future as well as stock. Do you really think TSIG cares what happen last year?

What importance is that at all to this year? Zip, zero, nada!!!!

This is just lawyer BS in the financial statements that you are talking about. It doesn't mean anything it just gives TSIG an out.

TSIG is running the show now, not CC anyways. If the TSIG management didn't have confidence they could add value to CC do you think they would have done the deal? ABSOLUTELY NOT!!!!!

You are discussing old news and mute points please let's talk about something else. This is a ridiculous conversation. Is this all you have left?

Gambler