SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Discuss Year 2000 Issues -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Hawkmoon who wrote (1974)6/6/1998 3:59:00 PM
From: John Mansfield  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 9818
 
'

with Jonathan Gregg June 4, 1998

The Martial Plan

Think the Year 2000 problem means mere
elevator snafus? Try dealing with a platoon
of Marines who show up in your front yard
to confiscate your hoarded lentils. Sen.
Robert Bennett (R-Utah) asked the deputy
secretary of defense at a hearing this
morning what plans the Pentagon has "in
the event of a Y2K-induced breakdown of
community services that might call for
martial law." John Hamre replied carefully,
but none too reassuringly, "We've got
fundamental issues to deal with that go
beyond just the Year 2000 contingency
planning. And I think you're right to bring
that up." Another distressing point that
came up at the Senate Armed Services
committee hearing was the fact that the
military directs one quarter of U.S. air
traffic. "You may be flying across the
country and an air traffic controller may be
a military guy in certain areas as opposed
to it being an FAA person," Hamre said.
Although the FAA's head Y2K guru
assured us this afternoon that the agency
will have its Y2K fixes complete by
October 1998, the military appears to be in
much worse shape. And other countries?
"We can be sure that there will be social
unrest in many parts of the world as a
result of Y2K," Bennett said. For the
record, though, Bennett did say, "I am not
one of those who says that Y2K will
automatically produce martial law," and
blamed "alarmists, extremists out there on
the Internet" for unnecessary
scaremongering. --By Declan
McCullagh/Washington

cgi.pathfinder.com



To: Hawkmoon who wrote (1974)6/6/1998 4:03:00 PM
From: John Mansfield  Respond to of 9818
 
montrealgazette.com