Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Aware, Inc. - Hot or cold IPO? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Satch77 who wrote (3838)	6/15/1998 8:57:00 PM
From: Captain James T. Kirk	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 9236

Monday June 15, 3:21 pm Eastern Time Company Press Release SOURCE: FORTUNE FORTUNE Chooses 12 Cool Companies for 1998 Magazine Also Reviews Cool Company Picks and Track Records of the Past Five Years NEW YORK, June 15, /PRNewswire/ -- With the help of high-tech analysts, venture capitalists and industry pundits, FORTUNE editors have compiled their annual list of cool tech companies. Reporter Julie Creswell also identified which of FORTUNE's 125 cool companies picked over the past five years were investing winners and which were wallet-busters. This year's list of Cool Companies, along with the breakdown of five years of winners and losers, appears in the July 6 issue of FORTUNE. In a surprising departure from previous years' lists, only three companies on the 1998 list are from California's Silicon Valley. Four of the companies are based in the Boston area and three others are headquartered in New York City and its suburbs. The 12 companies are: Teligent, a telecom company based in Vienna, VA; Reality Fusion, an interactive computing firm headquartered in Santa Cruz, CA; Check Point Software Technologies, a security software company with headquarters in San Francisco and Ramatgan, Israel; eFusion, manufacturers of internet telephony gear in Beaverton, OR; Dragon Systems, makers of speech-recognition software located in Newton, MA; E Ink, creators of electronic paper located in Cambridge, MA; Autonomy, makers of intelligent searching software with offices in Cambridge, England and San Francisco; Invention Machine, a software startup focused on scientists, inventors and researchers, headquartered in Boston; Aware (Nasdaq: AWRE - news), makers of software for high-speed modems based in Bedford, MA; CTR Group, which is building an underwater global fiber-optic network and is located in Woodcliff Lake, NJ; Laybourne Company, creators of content for TV and the Internet based in New York City; and Medscape, a Web Site with online data for doctors located in New York City. Any tech company, large or small, public or private, profitable or not, was eligible for consideration. In determining the list, FORTUNE editors and reporters relied on their high-tech sources to select which tech companies' management, products, ideas and technology are most exciting and ''cool.'' While Cool Companies is the least scientific of any of FORTUNE's lists, it has generated many picks that have proven to be savvy investments. Over the past five years, FORTUNE has dubbed 125 firms Cool Companies. If a person had invested $1,000 in the 42 companies that either were publicly traded when they appeared on the FORTUNE list, or had IPOs after FORTUNE named them as a ''Cool Company'', that investor would now have $76,830, a tad better than the S&P 500 stock index which would have turned that $42,000 into $75,223. That return handily beats the returns on two indexes that track smaller or more tech-oriented companies: the Nasdaq composite ($69,453) and the Russell 2000 index ($60,498). Had someone invested in PeopleSoft, one of FORTUNE's Cool Company picks in 1995, he would have had a 74.9% average annual return on his investment. Had he invested in the 1994 ''Cool Company'' Cisco Systems, his portfolio would have seen an 86% average annual return. Of the 125 companies on FORTUNE's Cool Companies list over the last five years, four firms went belly-up, 24 merged or were acquired, and 42 are public. Of the 42 public companies, 17 beat the S&P 500 and 25 did not. FORTUNE says there am three lessons that companies can learn from being tapped ''cool'': tech companies that don't stay on the cutting edge are doomed; timing is everything; and finally, cool products are no guarantee of success. The July 6 issue of FORTUNE is on newsstands beginning June 22. These stories, and other FORTUNE stories, are accessible at fortune.com. SOURCE: FORTUNE

To: Satch77 who wrote (3838)	6/16/1998 12:33:00 AM
From: Scrapps	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 9236

Cable modems vs. DSL; Microsoft hedges its bets By Matthew Broersma, ZDNet Monday June 15 11:43 PM ET News of investments by Microsoft Corp. (MSFT) and Compaq Computer Corp. (CPQ) in the RoadRunner cable-modem Internet access service Monday sparked renewed debate about what kind of connection will tie the home or office of the future to the Internet. While cable-based systems currently have substantially more subscribers than digital subscriber line (DSL), the telephone-based high-bandwidth system, some observers said the newest products from the Regional Bell Operating Companies (RBOCs) have far more potential. Microsoft and Compaq have made other investments in the cable-modem market, notably Microsoft's billion-dollar contribution to cable provider Comcast Corp. last year. But they are also active supporters of the competing technology DSL. The competition between DSL and cable modems is a horse race to see which industry -- cable providers or telephone companies -- will be the ones to cash in on the next generation of consumer Internet access. "Over time, the world likes a generic way of doing things," said Rob Enderle, director of desktop and mobile technology at Giga Information Group. "One or the other will win." Constant access Both DSL and cable modems offer not just greater speed than the conventional analog modems used today. They also offer a persistent connection -- the "always on" capability that business users enjoy at work. And that in itself, combined with greater speed, could lead to a new world of applications, from videoconferencing to home networking. But it is increasingly unclear which technology has the upper hand. Cable modems, which deliver Internet access over a cable-television connection, are far better established, with around 200,000 subscribers in North America. "That's 190,000 more than the telcos have," said analyst Jim Wahl of the Yankee Group. Telcos trying to rally The Baby Bells, for their part, have been making a slew of DSL-related announcements over the last week, announcing the upcoming rollouts of asymmetric digital subscriber line technology on both coasts, and even hailing a new, more reliable type of DSL -- optimistically called consumer digital subscriber line (CDSL). DSL, a digital technology, uses standard phone lines but requires the phone company to install special hardware in your house. "DSL technologies, on the whole, are about a year and change old. Cable modem technologies are 6 or 7 years old at least," said Harry Fenik, director of analysis at Zona Research Inc. "While ADSL is not the second coming -- and frankly, neither is CDSL -- it provides a taste of what can be done with existing infrastructure." He said that once the telcos put their mind to it, the rollout of this technology can be "swift and deep in penetration." Will cable hang on? So are the cable-modem companies -- including RoadRunner and market leader @Home -- squandering an early lead? Not quite, say many analysts, arguing the telcos have yet to demonstrate they can effectively get users to buy next-generation technology. "The keywords we're hearing from the RBOC community is that they're going to be rolling it out," said analyst Lisa Pelgrim with Dataquest. "Cable already has significant rollout." And what's more, with the limited geographic reach of both technologies, it could be some time before anyone has to choose between them: "If you have a choice of one option in the next three years, you'll be pretty lucky," Pelgrim said. "If you have a choice of two, buy a lottery ticket." DSL will deliver Some believe that in the long run, DSL will be able to deliver the necessary bandwidth and persistent connection with a minimum of infrastructure upgrades. And what's more, a single DSL connection can serve every telephone line in the house, opening up the prospect of an in-home computer network. "The prospect of instantly creating an environment where the whole house becomes Net-enabled is an extremely attractive one," said analyst Fenik. The bottom line, says Giga's Enderle, is that neither the telcos nor the cable companies are doing everything they can to roll out their technology quickly. The reason? It would mean replacing a lot of the infrastructure they've invested in over the years, which is, after all, still fine for carrying telephone or cable-TV signals. Outer-space access? And then there's the potential of satellite-based Net access looming overhead like the sword of Damocles. "There's the increasing possibility that after they finish (upgrading), this will all become obsolete from the next-generation satellite technology, and people will be uplinking through satellites instead of using wiring at all. ... Wireless could take both (DSL and cable modems) out."