Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : AREE - Formerly TVSI -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rich_1 who wrote (3534)	6/11/1998 2:03:00 PM
From: I Am John Galt	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6528

I personally would like to see them put in jail for hurting the public. LOL... you just don't get it, do you? None of you do. The nays being here shouldn't even be an issue if this company had a pot to p#ss in! To all investors of this company: Ask yourselves why your fellow shareholders continue to attack tonto's and s martin's credibility. What necessity does it play? It should show you that there's a hole wide open in the hull, and waters coming in like crazy. And, like the Titanic, the first class(the insiders) are the first to know about it, hence the price where it is right now. They are the first off the boat. Then the second class citizens(Riley & the Cavalry) hear about it... But many of them only barely. And the third class? Massacre. EJ Smith has retired into his cabin. The warning for an ice patch is ahead. The binoculars are nowhere to be found. I suggest a new course of attack... ...stop the engines and wait out the night. MG Out.

To: Rich_1 who wrote (3534)	6/11/1998 2:23:00 PM
From: tonto	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6528

Rich, where do you get these crazy irresponsible ideas that I am, as you and Pugs falsely state, complaining relentlessly to the SEC? While it may help paint a hype story, it is not true. But, that is not your point, is it? Investors are best served discussing the pluses and minuses of a company. For those that listened to the posts at RMIL, it may sense to some that the company had been proven to be issueing false releases, the hypesters had done very poor if any dd, and they made a decision to sell their stock for a profit or a small loss last year before the SEC halted the stock last December. Very little pink sheet action has occured since and the stock is way down from the high during the peak hype days. Illegal naked short or lack of any corporate fundamentals? The two sides disagree even today. To date, the RMIL investment/squeeze has been a tremendous failure for most. TVSI was hyped to be a $100,000,000 company soon. Why, when it has no money? How is this shell going to acquire operating companies with their shell stock to accomplish the rumor? It makes no sense, yet you want new investors to believe HUGE things are coming. The odds are stacked against the shell, and if you respect others people money, more caution is more responsible. Now we have a suppossed huge naked short here. Remember Pugs post last month where the shorts had to cover by the fifteenth? He never retracted that statement so we can assume if he knew what he was posting, the shorts have covered. Yet, now we have it reported the shorts are in big? Which version is it? It becomes much like the flavor of the day story. Whatever suits one's purpose. These threads can have value if information is shared. Hypeing alone is in no way to be considered a great sole source of responsible sharing of information. How many shares traded at .30 cents? Why must investors be tried to made to believe this was the value of the stock that was shorted down to .02+? How long did it trade during the pump and dump Monday at that price? TVSI may have a plan. They have filed and shown the sweetheart deals for Raabe and Associates. They have filed and shown what a lousy company it is and will be until this shell is made into an operating profitable company. If it ever will be. Some want us to desperately believe the carriage is already in front of the horse. That is not the case. Unfortunately, this creates the balance affect of information asking questions like how are they going to become a $100,000,000 company, which no one can answer. I simply ask, how are they going to become a $1,000,000 for starters?